主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 172-176.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.02.003

• 特别策划·血液透析管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

经中心静脉导管行血液净化治疗护理操作查检清单的构建与应用

梁俊卿 王颖 曹培叶 何新羽 范昌昌 李艳虹 芦秀洋 高灿灿   

  1. 北京大学人民医院泌尿外科,100044 北京市(梁俊卿);肾内科(王颖,曹培叶);重症医学科(何新羽,李艳虹);急诊科(范昌昌); 心外科(芦秀洋);呼吸与危重症医学科(高灿灿)
  • 出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 王颖,本科,主任护师,科护士长,E-mail:13611203602@163.com
  • 作者简介:梁俊卿,硕士,副主任护师,副护士长
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金资助项目(RDN 2023-13,RDN 2024-04)

Development and application of a nursing operational checklist for blood purification therapy via Central Venous Catheter

LIANG Junqing, WANG Ying, CAO Peiye, HE Xinyu, FAN Changchang, LI Yanhong, LU Xiuyang, GAO Cancan   

  1. Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
  • Online:2026-02-15 Published:2026-02-15
  • Contact: E-mail:13611203602@163.com

摘要: 目的:构建经中心静脉导管行血液净化治疗的护理操作查检清单(以下简称清单),并分析初步应用效果,为临床护理质量控制提供可借鉴的工具。方法:检索国内外相关政府网站、协会官网、指南网站和数据库,提取优质证据,初步拟定清单内容,邀请16位专家进行德尔菲函询,结合专家意见进行完善,形成清单终稿,并初步应用于一家三级甲等医院涉及该操作的8个护理单元。结果:共完成2轮函询,专家积极系数为100.00%和93.75%,专家权威系数为0.837和0.835,Kendall协调系数科学性、重要性分别为0.089、0.109和0.165、0.197,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。最终清单包括4个维度和37个条目。将清单作为质量控制工具及评分表进行初步应用后,与质量控制前相比,该项护理操作得分在质量控制中、后得到了明显提升(P<0.05)。结论:该清单内容涵盖关键要素和必须要素,具有科学性、可靠性和实用性,可促进临床护理行为规范化、同质化,为实施标准化质量管理提供借鉴。

关键词: 中心静脉导管;血液净化;查检清单;德尔菲法

Abstract: Objective: To develop a nursing operational checklist (hereinafter referred to as the checklist) for blood purification therapy via central venous catheter, and analyze its preliminary application effects, providing a reference tool for quality control of this procedure in clinical practice. Methods: We systematically reviewed government and association websites, guideline databases, and other relevant sources to extract high-quality evidence. A preliminary version of the checklist was drafted, and later 16 experts were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi consultation. The checklist was refined based on expert feedback to form the final version, which was then pilot-tested in eight nursing units of a tertiary grade A hospital where the procedure was performed. Results: Two rounds of consultation were completed, with expert participation rates of 100.00% and 93.75%, and authority coefficients of 0.837 and 0.835, respectively. The Kendall's W values were 0.089 and 0.109 for the first round, and 0.165 and 0.197 for the second round, all demonstrating statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The final checklist comprised 4 dimensions including 37 items. Compared with before quality control, preliminary application of the checklist as a quality control and scoring tool showed significant improvement in nursing procedure scores during and after quality control (P<0.05). Conclusion: The checklist comprehensively covers critical and essential elements, demonstrating scientific rigor, reliability, and practicality. It serves as a valuable reference for standardizing and homogenizing clinical nursing practices and implementing standardized quality management.

Key words: Central Venous Catheter; blood purification; checklist; Delphi method

中图分类号:  R47;R197