主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 140-145.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.01.027

• 专科管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

骨科患者围手术期疼痛管理决策支持系统的开发与应用

柏赟 王琦 周亚琼 吴婷 王晓庆 张园园   

  1. 南京中医药大学附属医院,江苏省中医院护理部,210029 南京市(柏赟,王琦,周亚琼,王晓庆,张园园);放射科(吴婷)
  • 出版日期:2026-01-15 发布日期:2026-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 张园园,本科,主任护师,护理部副主任,E-mail:540314441@qq.com E-mail:E-mail:boboyun2021@163.com
  • 作者简介:柏赟,本科,主管护师,护士长,E-mail:boboyun2021@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家中医优势专科建设单位项目(国中医药医政函〔2024〕90号);江苏省中医护理骨干人才高级研修项目(苏中医科教〔2022〕18号)

Development and application of an intelligent decision support system for perioperative pain management in orthopedic patients

BO Yun, WANG Qi, ZHOU Yaqiong, WU Ting, WANG Xiaoqing, ZHANG Yuanyuan   

  1. Nursing Department, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210029, China
  • Online:2026-01-15 Published:2026-01-15
  • Contact: E-mail:540314441@qq.com E-mail:E-mail:boboyun2021@163.com

摘要: 目的:评价骨科患者围手术期疼痛管理决策支持系统的应用效果,为提高决策支持的质量和效率提供参考。方法:以骨科患者围手术期疼痛管理知识库为基础,开发包括多维疼痛评估、疼痛预警与识别、逻辑推理规则与决策分析等功能的决策支持系统。采用便利抽样法,选取2022年10月—12月南京市某三级甲等医院骨科住院患者339例为对照组,采用常规疼痛护理管理,2024年1月—3月骨科住院患者330例为干预组,采用骨科患者围手术期疼痛管理决策支持系统进行管理。比较两组患者首次疼痛评估率、疼痛再评估率、疼痛处理及时率、中重度疼痛发生率、术后平均首次下床时间、护士和患者满意度及患者平均住院天数。结果:干预组患者首次疼痛评估率为99.1%,对照组首次疼痛评估率为85.3%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预组疼痛再评估率为96.1%,疼痛处理及时率为97.9%,高于对照组(P<0.05);干预组患者中重度疼痛发生率为22.1%,术后首次下床时间为(22.79±1.26)h,平均住院天数为(6.50±0.90)天,均低于对照组(均P<0.05)。干预组护士和患者满意度均高于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论:决策支持系统的应用可有效改善骨科患者围手术期疼痛护理管理闭环质量,提高护士工作效率,降低患者中重度疼痛发生率,实现患者术后早期下床,提高患者满意度。

关键词: 骨科;围手术期;疼痛护理管理;临床决策支持系统;闭环管理

Abstract: Objective: To assess the application effects of an intelligent decision support system for perioperative pain management in orthopedic patients, provide a reference for improving the quality and efficiency of decision support. Methods: We developed a clinical decision support system based on a knowledge base for perioperative pain management in orthopedic patients. The system supported multidimensional pain assessment, pain early warning and identification, rule-based reasoning, and decision analysis. Totally 339 orthopedic inpatients in a tertiary grade A hospital in Nanjing from October to December 2022 were recruited as the control group, and 330 orthopedic inpatients from January to March 2024 were recruited as the experimental group. The control group received conventional pain care management, while the experimental group was managed with an intelligent decision support system for perioperative pain management in orthopedics. The first pain assessment rate, re-assessment rate of moderate to severe pain, timely pain management rate, incidence of moderate to severe pain, average time of first postoperative ambulation, satisfaction of nurses and patients, and average hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results: The first pain assessment rate in the experimental group was 99.1%, and that in the control group was 85.3%, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The re-assessment rate of moderate to severe pain in the experimental group was 96.1%, and the timely pain management rate was 97.9%, which were higher than those in the control group. The incidence of moderate to severe pain in the experimental group was 22.1%, the average time of first postoperative ambulation was 22.79±1.26 hours, and the average hospital stay was 6.50±0.90 days, all of which were lower than those in the control group. The satisfaction scores of nurses and patients in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The intelligent decision support system for pain management effectively improves the closed-loop management quality of perioperative pain in orthopedic patients, enhances the work efficiency of nurses, reduces the incidence of moderate to severe pain in patients, enables early postoperative ambulation, and increases patient satisfaction.

Key words: orthopaedic; perioperative period; pain management; clinical decision support system; closed-loop management

中图分类号:  R47;R197