主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 1189-1194.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.08.013

• 老年护理服务能力提升专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年急性心肌梗死患者出院后衰弱变化轨迹及其影响因素

张彬彬 王艳 张晓雪 刘建萍 王文君 郭卫婷   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院急诊科,250012 济南市
  • 出版日期:2026-08-15 发布日期:2026-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭卫婷,硕士,主管护师,E-mail:597924412@qq.com
  • 作者简介:张彬彬,硕士,主管护师

Trajectory of frailty in geriatric patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction after discharge and its influencing factors

ZHANG Binbin, WANG Yan, ZHANG Xiaoxue, LIU Jianping, WANG Wenjun, GUO Weiting   

  1. Emergency Department, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
  • Online:2026-08-15 Published:2026-08-15
  • Contact: E-mail:597924412@qq.com

摘要: 目的:明确老年急性心肌梗死患者出院后衰弱变化轨迹的潜在类别及影响因素,为老年衰弱的精准预防和科学管理提供参考。方法:采用便利抽样法,于2023年5月至2024年5月选取山东省某三级甲等医院胸痛中心病房的老年首诊急性心肌梗死患者作为调查对象,采用FRAIL衰弱量表对其出院时及出院后1个月、3个月、6个月进行衰弱评估,使用潜类别增长模型识别轨迹类别,采用Logistic回归分析轨迹类别的影响因素。结果:共226例老年急性心肌梗死患者完成全部随访调查,识别出3个不同的衰弱变化轨迹,分别为低水平平稳组(36.7%)、中水平缓降组(50.0%)、高水平下降组(13.3%)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、文化程度、焦虑、社会支持水平,以及白细胞、N端脑钠肽前体、血红蛋白水平是患者衰弱轨迹的影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论:老年急性心肌梗死患者出院后呈现不同的衰弱变化轨迹,护士应针对不同类别、不同阶段及影响因素制定干预计划,实现精准延续护理。

关键词: 急性心肌梗死;衰弱轨迹;纵向研究;潜类别增长模型;影响因素

Abstract: Objective: To clarify latent classes and their influencing factors of frailty trajectories in geriatric patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) after discharge, and to provide references for precise prevention and scientific management of frailty in the geriatric. Methods: A convenience sampling method was used to select geriatric patients with first-diagnosis AMI in the chest pain center ward of a tertiary grade A hospital in Shandong from May 2023 to May 2024 as the survey subjects. The FRAIL scale was used to assess frailty at discharge, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge. The Latent Class Growth Model was used to identify trajectories, and Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of trajectories. Results: A total of 226 patients with AMI completed all follow-up surveys, and three different frailty trajectories were identified: the low-level stable group (36.7%), the medium-level slow-declining group (50.0%), and the high-level declining group (13.3%). Logistic regression analysis results showed that age, educational level, anxiety, social support level, white blood cells level, N-terminal natriuretic peptide precursor level, and hemoglobin level were influencing factors for patients' frailty trajectories (P<0.05). Conclusion: Geriatric patients with AMI show different frailty trajectories after discharge. Nurses should develop intervention plans based on different trajectories, stages, and influencing factors to achieve precise and continuous care.

Key words: Acute Myocardial Infarction; trajectory of frailty; longitudinal study; Latent Class Growth Model; influencing factor

中图分类号:  R47;R197