主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 1139-1144.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.08.004

• 特别策划·护理质量安全管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

非自杀性自伤住院青少年安全管理评价指标的构建

陈娟 张勤 倪桂辰 黄闻 丁慧 万宇辉 钟慧   

  1. 合肥市第四人民医院儿童青少年心理科,安徽医科大学附属心理医院,230022 合肥市(陈娟,张勤,倪桂辰,黄闻,丁慧,钟慧);安徽医科大学公共卫生学院(万宇辉)
  • 出版日期:2026-08-15 发布日期:2026-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 钟慧,博士,主任医师,主任,E-mail:313956777@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈娟,硕士,副主任护师,护理部副主任
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(82073576);安徽省卫生健康科研项目(AHWJ2024Ab0213);安徽医科大学校科研基金项目(2023xkj232)

Construction of safety management evaluation indicators for hospitalized adolescents with Non-Suicidal Self-Injury

CHEN Juan, ZHANG Qin, NI Guichen, HUANG Wen, DING Hui, WAN Yuhui, ZHONG Hui   

  1. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Hefei Fourth People’s Hospital, Affiliated Psychological Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei, 230022, China
  • Online:2026-08-15 Published:2026-08-15
  • Contact: E-mail:313956777@qq.com

摘要: 目的:构建非自杀性自伤住院青少年安全管理评价指标,为其非自杀性自伤风险管理及精神科护理质量提升提供理论依据。方法:基于“M-SHEL”系统事故分析模型,结合文献分析结果初步拟定指标初稿;通过德尔菲专家函询法和层次分析法进行指标筛选及权重确定。结果:共邀请15名专家进行了两轮函询,问卷回收率分别为100.0%和86.7%,权威系数分别为0.897、0.917,肯德尔协调系数分别为0.143、0.270(均P<0.001)。最终构建的评价指标包括一级指标5项(管理风险、软件风险、硬件风险、环境风险、人员风险)、二级指标15项、三级指标53项。结论:本研究构建的评价指标具有较好的科学性和适配性,对非自杀性自伤住院青少年安全管理具有指导意义,具有较好的实用价值和推广前景。

关键词: 非自杀性自伤;青少年;M-SHEL模型;安全管理;指标

Abstract: Objective: To construct safety management evaluation indicators for hospitalized adolescents with Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI), providing a theoretical basis for their NSSI risk management and psychiatric nursing quality improvement. Methods: Based on the M-SHEL accident analysis model, a preliminary draft of the indicators was developed through literature analysis. The Delphi expert consultation method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process were applied for indicator screening and weight determination. Results: Totally 15 experts were invited to participate in two rounds of consultation. The questionnaire response rates were 100.0% and 86.7%; the authority coefficients were 0.897 and 0.917, respectively; and the Kendall's W values were 0.143 and 0.270 (both P<0.001), respectively. The final evaluation indicators consisted of 5 first-level indicators (Management risk, Software risk, Hardware risk, Environmental risk, Liveware risk), 15 second-level indicators, and 53 third-level indicators. Conclusion: The safety management evaluation indicators are structurally sound, scientifically grounded, and highly operable. It demonstrates strong practical value and potential for application, and can serve as a reference for clinical risk assessment and management.

Key words: Non-Suicidal Self-Injury; adolescent; M-SHEL model; safety management; indicator

中图分类号:  R47;R197