主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 1399-1404.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.09.022

• 延续护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

社区癌症患者“互联网+”安宁疗护服务质量评价指标体系的构建

杨润欢 杨丽娜 敬然 贺晓莉   

  1. 宁夏医科大学护理学院,750004 银川市(杨润欢);银川市第一人民医院护理部(杨丽娜);延续护理中心(敬然);肿瘤内科(贺晓莉)
  • 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨丽娜,硕士,主任护师,护理部主任,E-mail:yln9912@126.com E-mail:E-mail:1591400566@qq.com
  • 作者简介:杨润欢,硕士在读,主管护师,E-mail:1591400566@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目(2026BEG02065)

Establishing a quality evaluation index system for "Internet+" palliative care services for community cancer patients

YANG Runhuan, YANG Lina, JING Ran, HE Xiaoli   

  1. School of Nursing, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China
  • Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-15
  • Contact: E-mail:yln9912@126.com E-mail:E-mail:1591400566@qq.com

摘要: 目的:构建社区癌症患者“互联网+”安宁疗护服务质量评价指标体系,以期为“互联网+”安宁疗护服务提供全面系统的科学管理依据。方法:于2024年12月至2025年6月,以服务质量评价模型(SERVQUAL模型)为理论框架,通过文献检索、小组讨论和德尔菲法,构建社区癌症患者“互联网+”安宁疗护服务质量评价指标体系。运用层次分析法确定各级指标的权重。结果:2轮专家函询问卷的有效回收率均为100%,专家权威系数分别为0.853和0.863,肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.156和0.203(P<0.01)。最终形成的社区癌症患者“互联网+”安宁疗护服务质量评价指标体系包括5项一级指标、12项二级指标、69项三级指标。结论:构建的社区癌症患者“互联网+”安宁疗护服务质量评价指标体系具有较好的科学性与可靠性,可为“互联网+”安宁疗护服务质量评价提供参考。

关键词: 癌症;互联网+;安宁疗护;服务质量;指标体系

Abstract: Objective: To develop an "Internet+" quality evaluation indicator system for palliative care services for cancer patients in the community, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and systematic scientific basis for the management of "Internet+" palliative care services. Methods: From December 2024 to June 2025, using the SERVQUAL model as a theoretical framework, we developed an evaluation index system for the quality of "Internet+" palliative care services for community cancer patients through literature reviews, group discussions, and the Delphi method. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was then employed to determine the weights of indicators at each level. Results: The response rates for both rounds of the expert questionnaire were 100%. The expert authority coefficients were 0.853 and 0.863, respectively, and the Kendall's coefficient of concordance was 0.156 and 0.203, respectively (P<0.01). The final "Internet+" palliative care services quality evaluation index system for community cancer patients comprised 5 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators, and 69 third-level indicators. Conclusion: The "Internet+" palliative care services, quality evaluation index system developed for cancer patients in the community is scientifically sound and reliable, and thus can serve as a reference for evaluating the quality of "Internet+" palliative care services.

Key words: cancer; Internet+; palliative care; service quality; indicator system

中图分类号:  R47;R197