主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (12): 1785-1790.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.12.006

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

新生儿皮肤损伤风险评估工具的构建

刘慧娟 陈华 杨园园 梁爽 孙娟   

  1. 北京大学护理学院妇儿教研室,100191(刘慧娟,陈华,杨园园,梁爽);解放军总医院第五医学中心新生儿科(刘慧娟,孙娟)
  • 出版日期:2019-12-15 发布日期:2019-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 梁爽,本科,副教授,硕士生导师,E-mail:liangsh@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘慧娟,本科,主管护师

Development of the neonatal skin injury risk assessment tool with Delphi method

LIU Huijuan, CHEN Hua, YANG Yuanyuan, LIANG Shuang, SUN Juan   

  1. Department of Gynecology & Pediatrics, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
  • Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-12-15
  • Contact: E-mail:liangsh@bjmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的:构建适用于我国的新生儿皮肤损伤风险评估工具。方法:采用德尔菲法,以新生儿皮肤风险评估量表(The Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale,NSRAS)及新生儿组织活力风险评估量表(The Neonatal Tissue Viability Risk Assessment Tool,TNTVRAT)为参考,以Bergstorm的皮肤压力损伤概念模型和Vincen患者风险和安全分析理论为框架,在访谈18名临床医师和护士的基础上形成专家咨询问卷;选取17名专家进行两轮专家咨询,对量表的条目进行筛选,形成最终的新生儿皮肤损伤风险评估工具。结果:专家的积极性较高,两轮问卷的有效回收率分别为94.74%和94.44%;两轮问卷的专家权威系数分别为0.841和0.885。两轮咨询后,专家意见的协调系数W为0.460(P<0.01);形成了包括胎龄、体质量、皮肤潮湿、营养摄入状态、摩擦力和剪切力、组织氧合和灌注、医用设备使用种类、自主活动、外渗药物使用共9个条目的新生儿皮肤损伤风险评估量表。结论:德尔菲法构建的新生儿皮肤损伤风险评估工具有较高的可靠性和权威性,可以为临床护士评估新生儿皮肤风险提供参考依据,为下一步检测该量表的信度、效度和评估量表的预测能力做铺垫。

关键词: 德尔菲法;新生儿;皮肤护理;量表

Abstract: Objective: To develop the neonatal skin injury risk assessment tool for measuring of Chinese neonatal skin injury risk. Methods: Using the Delphi method, the Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale and The Neonatal Tissue Viability Risk Assessment Tool for reference, with bergstorm's conceptual model of skin pressure injury and Vincen's risk and safety analysis theory as the framework, the expert consultation questionnaire was formed on the basis of interviews with 18 clinicians and nurses. Seventeen experts were selected for two rounds of expert consultation, and the items of the scale were screened to form the final risk assessment tool for neonatal skin injury. Results: The expert's positivity was high and the response rates of the two-round consultation were 94.74% and 94.44% and the coefficient of the expert's authorities Cr were 0.841 and 0.885, after the two-round consultation, Kendall's W was 0.460 (P<0.01). Finally, the neonatal skin injury risk assessment tool included nine items (gestational age, weight, humidity, nutritional intake status, friction and shear force, tissue oxygenation and perfusion, types of medical equipment, autonomous activities, use of exosmosis drugs) was formulated. Conclusion: The reliability and authority of neonatal skin injury risk assessment tool developed with Delphi method is relatively high. It can provide a reference for clinical nurses to evaluate the skin risk of newborns and lays a foundation for testing the reliability and validity and evaluating the predictive ability of the scale.

Key words: Delphi method; neonatal; skin nursing; scale

中图分类号: 

  • R47