关键词: 护理临床实践指南；质量评价；中国护理临床实践指南评价体系；RIGHT清单；指南实施性评价工具

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the quality of clinical nursing practice guidelines in China. Methods: Two researchers searched domestic and foreign databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, CNKI, China Biomedical Abstracts Database (CBM), Wanfang Database, VIP Chinese Sci-tech Journals Database (VIP) and related websites from inception until July 31, 2019. The quality of the included guidelines was evaluated by using the evaluation tool for Chinese clinical practice guidelines (AGREE-China), the RIGHT list and the implementation evaluation tool for guidelines (GLIA 2.0). Results: A total of 20 guidelines were included. The average score of AGREE-China was 71.71 ±13.16. The overall reporting rates of the RIGHT list were between 0 and 100.0%. In the results of implementation evaluation, the highest coincidence rate of a single guideline was 100.0%, and the lowest was 60.0%. Conclusion: The overall quality of Chinese nursing clinical practice guidelines is good, but there are few reports on effectiveness / safety, autonomy and types of conflict of interest.

Key words: clinical practice guideline; quality evaluation; AGREE-China; RIGHT list; implementation evaluation tools for guidelines