主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 1452-1456.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.10.003

• 特别策划·疼痛护理管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

刺络拔罐对急性期带状疱疹患者神经病理性疼痛的影响

刘姝 张素秋 杨艳明 秦阳阳 祁晨旭 罗怡欣 赵梦萍 王文君   

  1. 河南中医药大学第一附属医院护理部,450003 郑州市(刘姝,杨艳明,秦阳阳,祁晨旭,罗怡欣);中国中医科学院广安门医院护理部(张素秋);河南中医药大学护理学院(赵梦萍,王文君)
  • 出版日期:2025-10-15 发布日期:2025-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 张素秋,大专,主任护师,硕士生导师,E-mail:gamzsq@163.com E-mail:E-mail:150852554@qq.com
  • 作者简介:刘姝,博士,副主任护师,护理部主任,E-mail:150852554@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省科技研发计划联合基金(242301420097);国家中医优势专科(护理学)(国中医药医政函〔2024〕90号);河南省中医药重点学科(中医护理学)

Effects of blood-pricking cupping therapy on neuropathic pain in patients with acute-phase herpes zoster

LIU Shu, ZHANG Suqiu, YANG Yanming, QIN Yangyang, QI Chenxu, LUO Yixin, ZHAO Mengping, WANG Wenjun   

  1. Nursing Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450003, China
  • Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-15
  • Contact: E-mail:gamzsq@163.com E-mail:E-mail:150852554@qq.com

摘要: 目的:评价刺络拔罐治疗急性期带状疱疹患者神经病理性疼痛的效果,为带状疱疹急性期的神经病理性疼痛规范化中西医结合治疗与护理提供依据。方法:2025年1月—6月,便利选取郑州市某三级甲等中医院皮肤科收治住院的带状疱疹急性期患者60例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组各30例。对照组采用常规治疗方式;观察组在常规治疗基础上联合刺络拔罐疗法,每日1次,连续干预14天。比较两组患者的疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、症状体征量化积分、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分及医院焦虑抑郁量表评分,并记录患者带状疱疹后遗神经痛发生情况。结果:干预后,观察组疼痛VAS评分、症状体征积分、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数及医院焦虑抑郁量表评分低于对照组(均P<0.05);观察组带状疱疹后遗神经痛发生率(6.67%)低于对照组(26.67%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:刺络拔罐联合常规治疗可有效缓解带状疱疹急性期疼痛,改善患者睡眠质量与焦虑、抑郁情绪,降低带状疱疹后遗神经痛风险,具有重要临床应用价值。

关键词: 带状疱疹;急性期;刺络拔罐;带状疱疹后遗神经痛;疼痛护理

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of blood-pricking cupping therapy on neuropathic pain in patients with acute-phase herpes zoster, and to provide a basis for standardizing integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment and nursing for this condition. Methods: From January to June 2025, 60 patients with acute herpes zoster admitted to the Dermatology Department of a tertiary grade A Chinese Medicine Hospital in Zhengzhou were selected by convenience sampling method. They were divided into an observation group and a control group using a random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. The control group received conventional treatment, while the observation group was given blood-pricking cupping therapy on the basis of conventional treatment, once a day for 14 consecutive days. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, quantitative scores of symptoms and signs, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia after rash resolution was recorded. Results: After the intervention, the VAS pain score and the quantitative score of symptoms and signs in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (both P<0.05); the PSQI score and the HADS score in the observation group were also lower than those in the control group (both P<0.05). Additionally, the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia in the observation group (6.67%) was lower than that in the control group (26.67%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Combining blood-pricking cupping therapy with conventional treatment can effectively relieve pain in the acute phase of herpes zoster, improve patients' sleep quality as well as anxiety and depression, reduce the risk of postherpetic neuralgia, and thus has important clinical application value.

Key words: herpes zoster; acute stage; blood-pricking cupping therapy; postherpetic neuralgia; pain nursing

中图分类号:  R47;R197