主管：国家卫生健康委员会
主办：国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊（中国科技论文统计源期刊）
中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 32-38.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.01.008

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

管理关怀性评估量表的汉化及信度效度检验

彭笑 周红 曾庆松 龚爱萍 胡艳红 高祖梅   

  1. 长江大学医学部护理系，434023 湖北省荆州市（彭笑，周红，龚爱萍，胡艳红）；荆州市第一人民医院/长江大学附属第一医院妇产科（曾庆松）；护理部（高祖梅）
  • 出版日期:2020-01-15 发布日期:2020-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 高祖梅，本科，主任护师，护理部主任，E-mail:gaozumei1970@126.com
  • 作者简介:彭笑，硕士，讲师
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生和计划生育委员会联合基金项目（WJ2018H196）；人文护理专委会科研项目（RW2016AQ04）

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Caring Assessment Tool-administration Scale

PENG Xiao, ZHOU Hong, ZENG Qingsong, GONG Aiping, HU Yanhong, GAO Zumei   

  1. School of Nursing, Medical College of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434023, China
  • Online:2020-01-15 Published:2020-01-15
  • Contact: E-mail:gaozumei1970@126.com

PDF (PC)

374

赞

摘要： 目的：汉化管理关怀性评估量表（Caring Assessment Tool-administration，CAT-admin），并检验其信度和效度。方法：在获得原量表作者同意后，通过翻译、回译和文化调适，形成中文版CAT-admin量表，将该量表应用于356名临床护士中，对量表信度和效度进行评价。结果：中文版CAT-admin量表共36个条目，3个维度，可解释总变异的73.542%。验证性因子分析，各项拟合指标基本良好。量表Cronbach’s?α系数为0.965，各维度Cronbach’s?α系数为0.926～0.960；量表的分半信度为0.875，各维度的分半信度为0.907～0.952；量表的重测信度为0.933，各维度的重测信度为0.802～0.949。CAT-admin量表条目水平的内容效度指数为0.83～1.00，量表水平的内容效度指数为0.89。结论：中文版CAT-admin量表具有较好的信度和效度，可以作为测量我国护士对护理管理者关怀性感知的评估工具。

关键词: 护理管理者；关怀；护士；信度；效度

Abstract: Objective: To translate the English version of the Caring Assessment Tool-administration (CAT-admin) scale into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods: After obtaining the consent of the author of the source scale, procedure of double back translation and cross-cultural adaptation was conducted. The Chinese version of the CAT-admin scale was tested to 356 nurses to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: The Chinese version of the CAT-admin included 36 items and three dimensions, which explained 73.542% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated all fitting indexes were basically good. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.965 and the Cronbach’s α of each factor was 0.926-0.960. The split half reliability of the total scale was 0.875 and 0.907-0.952 for each dimension. The test-retest reliability was 0.933 for the total scale and 0.802-0.949 for each dimension. Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.83 to 1.00 and Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI) was 0.89. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the CAT-admin scale showed good reliability and validity, and can be used as a valid tool to evaluate staff nurses’ perceptions of nurse-managers caring competence in China.

Key words: nurse manager; caring; nurse; reliability; validity

中图分类号:  R47
版权所有 © 《中国护理管理》杂志社   京公网安备 11010202005821号   京ICP备11024163号


本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发