主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 278-284.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.02.022

• 专科管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

烧伤患者吸入性损伤肺康复管理策略制定

郭晓娟 王蓉 凡国华 于新涛 霍明丽 张小艳   

  1. 江苏省苏北人民医院护理部,225000 江苏省扬州市(郭晓娟,凡国华,于新涛);整形烧伤科(王蓉);扬州大学医学部(郭晓娟,王蓉,凡国华,霍明丽,张小艳)
  • 出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 王蓉,硕士,副主任护师,护士长,E-mail:wangr8905@126.com
  • 作者简介:郭晓娟,硕士,主任护师,护理部副主任
  • 基金资助:
    苏北人民医院护理研究专项资助项目(SBHL25001);扬州市科技计划社会发展项目(YZ2024108);江苏省人兽共患病学重点实验室“护馨基金”项目(HX2208)

Development of pulmonary rehabilitation management strategies for burn patients with inhalation injury

GUO Xiaojuan, WANG Rong, FAN Guohua, YU Xintao, HUO Mingli, ZHANG Xiaoyan   

  1. Nursing Department, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, Jiangsu province, 225000, China
  • Online:2026-02-15 Published:2026-02-15
  • Contact: E-mail:wangr8905@126.com

摘要: 目的:构建科学的烧伤患者吸入性损伤肺康复管理策略,以期为规范其肺康复管理行为提供参考。方法:以健康服务领域研究成果应用的行动促进框架为指导,纳入前期研究获得的17条吸入性损伤肺康复管理证据,制订审查指标,并明确审查方法,基于专家访谈,从变革、变革接收者、组织环境等方面对执行率<60.0%的指标开展影响因素的分析,并制定变革策略。结果:共制订35个审查指标,19个审查指标执行率<60.0%。障碍因素包括3个方面:变革相关因素中未按照相关证据制定肺康复评估流程等;变革接受者相关因素中医护人员肺康复管理知识及技能缺乏等;组织环境相关因素中肺康复设备配置不足等。促进因素则包括管理支持、多学科团队协作积极性高及医院信息系统开发能力高。基于影响因素明确了组建多学科团队、构建工作流程等变革策略。结论:烧伤患者吸入性损伤肺康复管理的临床实践与证据间尚存在较大差距,医护人员应充分利用促进因素,努力克服障碍因素,促进证据的有效应用。

关键词: 吸入性损伤;肺康复;审查指标;影响因素;循证实践

Abstract: Objective: To develop scientific management strategies for pulmonary rehabilitation management in burn patients with inhalation injuries, aiming to provide a reference for standardizing their pulmonary rehabilitation management practices. Methods: The integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework was used as a guide and 17 pieces of evidence on pulmonary rehabilitation management for inhalation injury obtained from a previous study were included. Then, review indicators were developed, review methods were clarified, and analyses of factors affecting change were carried out on indicators with an implementation rate lower than 60.0% in terms of factors related to change, factors related to the recipients of change, and factors related to the organizational environment on the basis of expert interviews. Change strategies were formulated based on these analyses. Results: A total of 35 review indicators were formulated, with 19 indicators having an implementation rate of less than 60.0%. The obstacles included three aspects: failure to develop a pulmonary rehabilitation assessment process in accordance with the evidence in the change-related factors; the lack of knowledge and skills in pulmonary rehabilitation management among healthcare workers in the change-receiver-related factors; and the lack of pulmonary rehabilitation equipment in the organizational environment-related factors. Facilitating factors covered management support, high multidisciplinary teamwork motivation, and good hospital information system development capabilities. In addition, specific change strategies such as the formation of multidisciplinary teams and the construction of workflows were clarified. Conclusion: There is still a large gap between clinical practice and evidence in the management of pulmonary rehabilitation in burn patients with inhalation injuries. Healthcare professionals should make full use of facilitators and work to overcome barriers for effective application of the evidence.

Key words: inhalation injury; pulmonary rehabilitation; review indicator; influencing factor; evidence-based practice

中图分类号:  R47;R197