主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生计生委医院管理研究所
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊 中国科技核心期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》入选期刊

Chinese Nursing Management ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10): 1496-1500.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.10.013

• Research Papers • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the short form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective for Palliative Care

ZHANG Yanhui, WEI Wanhong, HU Yanli, YAO Ying   

  1. Nursing and Health School, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China
  • Online:2021-10-15 Published:2021-10-15
  • Contact: E-mail:zdwww@zzu.edu.cn

Abstract: Objective: To translate and verify the validity and reliability of the short form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient’s Perspective for Palliative Care (QPP-PC). Methods: Standard forward-back translation techniques, including translation, back translation and cross-cultural adaptation, were used in the translation of the QPP-PC according to the Brislin translation model. Reliability and validity were tested with QPP-PC data collected from 420 subjects in two pilot hospice care hospitals and one hospice care ward in Henan Province by convenience sampling. Results: The Chinese version of QPP-PC included 4 dimensions: Medical-technical competence (2 items), Physical-technical conditions (3 items), Identity-oriented approach (9 items), Sociocultural atmosphere (6 items) and 5 single items. Each item needs to be answered in terms of both Subjective Importance (SI) and Perceived reality (PR). The Cronbach’s α coefficient of SI subscale is 0.918, the retest reliability is 0.901, and the half reliability is 0.751. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of PR subscale is 0.900, the retest reliability is 0.887, and the half-fold reliability is 0.779. Conclusion: The Chinese version QPP-PC shows high validity and reliability to be used in assessing the quality of palliative care.

Key words: palliative care; nursing quality; scale translation; reliability; validity

CLC Number: 

  • R47