主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生计生委医院管理研究所
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊 中国科技核心期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》入选期刊

Chinese Nursing Management ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 186-190.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.02.006

• Research Papers • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Clinical Leadership Survey

LI Quan, WAN Qiaoqin, YANG Yue   

  1. Nursing School of Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
  • Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-15
  • Contact: E-mail:qqwan05@163.com;E-mail:yangyuekq@163.com

Abstract: Objective: To conduct translation and cross-cultural modification of the Clinical Leadership Survey (CLS), to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Methods: The Chinese version of CLS was developed through the process of translation and back-translation, conduct cross-cultural modification through expert consultation and pilot-test. Totally 315 clinical nurses were investigated through convenience sampling for test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of CLS. Four experts conducted content validity evaluation. Results: The Chinese version of CLS consisted of 5 factors and 15 items. The items analysis indicated that the CR was more than 3.0 and correlation coefficients between the items and the total score were 0.680-0.829 (P<0.01). The confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=2.413, RMSEA=0.079, TLI=0.917 and CFI=0.941. The content validity results were confirmed with I-CVIs and S-CVI of 1. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the overall scale was 0.942, and ranging from 0.748-0.889 for each factor. The test-retest reliability was 0.892 (P<0.001). Conclusion: The Chinese version of CLS has proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used as a valid tool to evaluate the leadership of clinical nurses in China.

Key words: clinical leadership; nurse; staff nurse clinical leadership; reliability; validity

CLC Number: 

  • R47