主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 564-570.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.04.016

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

糖尿病前期进展为糖尿病的风险预测模型的系统评价

牛桃 赵芳 刘宇 冯晨秋 吴瑾 于秋爽   

  1. 北京中医药大学护理学院,100029 北京市(牛桃,刘宇,于秋爽);中日友好医院护理部(赵芳,冯晨秋);体检中心(吴瑾)
  • 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 赵芳,本科,主任护师,护理部主任,E-mail:zhaof01@aliyun.com
  • 作者简介:牛桃,硕士在读,护师
  • 基金资助:
    中日友好医院高水平医院临床业务费专项临床研究项目(2023-NHLHCRF-GLMS-11)

Risk prediction models for progression from prediabetes to diabetes mellitus: a systematic review

NIU Tao, ZHAO Fang, LIU Yu, FENG Chenqiu, WU Jin, YU Qiushuang   

  1. School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
  • Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-04-15
  • Contact: E-mail:zhaof01@aliyun.com

摘要: 目的:系统评价糖尿病前期患者进展为糖尿病的风险预测模型,以期为临床实践提供参考。方法:检索中、英文数据库中的相关文献,检索时间为建库至2025年1月,2名研究者独立进行文献筛选和资料提取,使用预测模型研究的偏倚风险评价工具对纳入的研究进行偏倚风险和适用性评价,并使用MedCalc软件对ROC曲线下面积进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入23篇文献,41个风险预测模型,ROC曲线下面积为0.643~0.925。22篇文献为高偏倚风险,1篇文献偏倚风险不清楚,6篇为低适用性。Meta分析显示,合并效应量ROC曲线下面积为0.768(95%CI:0.732~0.804),模型重复报告的预测因子有空腹血糖、体质量指数、年龄、糖化血红蛋白和甘油三酯等。结论:糖尿病前期进展为糖尿病的风险预测模型的整体预测性能良好,但偏倚风险较高,未来应完善模型构建方法,以开发出质量更高的风险预测模型。

关键词: 糖尿病前期;糖尿病;预测模型;风险评分;系统评价

Abstract: Objective: To systematically review risk prediction models for the progression from prediabetes to diabetes mellitus, and to provide references for clinical practice. Methods: Related literature was retrieved from Chinese and English databases, with the search period ranging from the establishment of each database to January 2025. Two researchers independently performed literature screening and data extraction. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used to evaluate the risk of bias and applicability of the included studies. Meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was conducted using MedCalc software. Results: A total of 23 articles comprising 41 risk prediction models were included. AUC value ranged from 0.643 to 0.925. Twenty-two studies were rated as having a high risk of bias, one had an unclear risk of bias, and six were rated as having low applicability. Meta-analysis showed a pooled AUC value of 0.768 (95%CI: 0.732-0.804). Frequently reported predictors included fasting blood glucose, body mass index, age, glycated hemoglobin, and triglycerides, etc. Conclusion: Risk prediction models for progression from prediabetes to diabetes mellitus generally demonstrate good predictive performance. However, most studies have a high risk of bias. Future research should focus on improving model development methods to create higher-quality risk prediction models.

Key words: prediabetes; diabetes mellitus; prediction model; risk score; systematic review

中图分类号:  R47;R197