主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 535-541.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.04.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

手术室医护人员专业沟通量表的汉化及信度效度检验

何昭好 汤婷 李斌 张帅   

  1. 海南省人民医院(海南医科大学附属海南医院)手术室,570311 海口市(何昭好,汤婷);审计部(李斌);护理部(张帅)
  • 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 张帅,硕士,副主任护师,护理部主任,E-mail:zhsh802@163.com
  • 作者简介:何昭好,硕士,主管护师
  • 基金资助:
    2025年度海南省高等学校教育教学改革研究项目(Hnjg2025-101,Hnjg2025ZC-58);2025年海南省卫生健康科技创新联合项目(WSJK2025QN019)

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Nurse-Doctor Professional Communication Questionnaire

HE Zhaohao, TANG Ting, LI Bin, ZHANG Shuai   

  1. The Operating Room, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, 570311, China
  • Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-04-15
  • Contact: E-mail:zhsh802@163.com

摘要: 目的:汉化英文版手术室医护人员专业沟通量表(Nurse-Doctor Professional Communication Questionnaire,NDPCQ)并进行信度及效度检验,为评估我国手术室医护人员专业沟通氛围提供测评工具。方法:依据Brislin原则翻译英文版NDPCQ,由8名专家评价中文版NDPCQ的内容效度。2023年10月至2025年2月,采用中文版NDPCQ对1 142名手术室医护人员开展调查以检验其信度、效度,采用随机拆分法将450份问卷用于探索性因子分析,692份问卷用于验证性因子分析。结果:中文版NDPCQ共有4个维度、33个条目;各条目的内容效度指数为0.875~1.000,量表水平的内容效度指数为0.968,验证性因子分析结果显示,χ2/df=3.399,RMSEA=0.059,CFI=0.926,TLI=0.919,IFI=0.926,GFI=0.863。总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.945,折半信度为0.817,重测信度为0.855。结论:中文版NDPCQ具有良好的信度及效度,可作为测评我国手术室医护人员专业沟通氛围的有效工具。

关键词: 手术室;专业沟通;信度;效度;量表

Abstract: Objective: To cross-culturally adapt the Nurse-Doctor Professional Communication Questionnaire (NDPCQ) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity, so as to provide an evaluation tool for the professional communication atmosphere of medical staff in operating room in China. Methods: The English version of NDPCQ was translated according to the Brislin principle, and the content validity of the Chinese version of NDPCQ was evaluated by eight experts. From October 2023 to February 2025, 1142 operating room medical staff were surveyed using the Chinese version of NDPCQ to test its reliability and validity. The random splitting method was adopted, with 450 questionnaires utilized for exploratory factor analysis and 692 questionnaires for confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The Chinese version of NDPCQ consisted of 4 dimensions and 33 items. The content validity index I-CVI of each item was 0.875-1.000, and the S-CVI/Ave was 0.968. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=3.399, RMSEA=0.059, CFI=0.926, TLI=0.919, IFI =0.926, and GFI=0.863. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.945, the split-half reliability was 0.817, and the test-retest reliability was 0.855. Conclusion: The Chinese version of NDPCQ demonstrates adequate reliability and validity, and can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the professional communication atmosphere of medical staff in operating rooms in China.

Key words: operating room; professional communication; reliability; validity; scale

中图分类号:  R47;R197