主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9): 1311-1316.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.09.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床护士院内卒中识别与救治知信行问卷的编制及信度效度检验

杨楠 蒋旭萍 曾水英 曾国勇 丁梅 郭俊清 邱红   

  1. 南方医科大学南方医院赣州医院神经外科,341000 江西省赣州市(杨楠,曾水英);神经内科(蒋旭萍,曾国勇,郭俊清);赣南医科大学护理学院(丁梅);赣南卫生健康职业学院(邱红)
  • 出版日期:2025-09-15 发布日期:2025-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 邱红,硕士,主任护师,副校长,E-mail:Qiuhong2383@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨楠,硕士
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(82360251);江西省卫生健康委科技计划(202311941);赣州市科技计划项目(2023LNS17491)

Development and reliability and validity of the clinical nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire for in-hospital stroke recognition and management

YANG Nan, JIANG Xuping, ZENG Shuiying, ZENG Guoyong, DING Mei, GUO Junqing, QIU Hong   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi province, 341000, China
  • Online:2025-09-15 Published:2025-09-15
  • Contact: E-mail:Qiuhong2383@163.com

摘要: 目的:编制评估临床护士院内卒中识别与救治知信行水平的问卷,为评价临床护士院内卒中识别与救治知识、信念、行为提供有效工具。方法:以知信行理论为框架,通过文献回顾、德尔菲专家函询、预调查确定问卷条目池。采用便利抽样的方法,于2024年10月选取赣州市448名临床护士进行调查,以进行问卷项目分析和信度、效度检验。结果:最终形成的问卷包括3个维度34个条目。条目水平的内容效度指数为0.830~1.000,问卷平均内容效度指数为0.960。探索性因子分析共提取6个公因子,累计方差贡献率为60.225%。验证性因子显示各条目因子载荷在0.532~0.837之间,模型拟合较好。问卷总Cronbach’s α系数为0.943,重测信度为0.933,折半信度为0.765。结论:本问卷具有良好的信度、效度,可以作为评估临床护士院内卒中识别和救治知信行水平的科学工具。

关键词: 临床护士;院内卒中;识别与救治;知信行;效度;信度

Abstract: Objective: To develop a questionnaire to evaluate clinical nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices in recognizing and managing in-hospital stroke, providing a validated tool to assess their current competencies in stroke identification and emergency care. Methods: Based on the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice theory, the item pool of the questionnaire was established through a comprehensive approach, which encompassed an in-depth literature review, Delphi expert consultations, and pilot survey. Subsequently, a total of 448 clinical nurses were surveyed by using convenience sampling method in Ganzhou in October 2024 to conduct item analysis as well as reliability and validity tests on the questionnaire. Results: The final questionnaire consisted of 34 items in 3 dimensions. The content validity at the item level ranged from 0.830 to 1.000, and the average content validity of the questionnaire was 0.960. Exploratory factor analysis extracted a total of 6 common factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 60.225%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the factor loading of each item ranged from 0.532 to 0.837, indicating a good model fit. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.943, the test-retest reliability was 0.933, and the split-half reliability was 0.765. Conclusion: This questionnaire, which demonstrates good reliability and validity, can thus be employed as an instrument for comprehensively assessing the knowledge, attitude, and practice levels of clinical nurses in relation to in-hospital stroke recognition and management.

Key words: clinical nurse; in-hospital stroke; identification and treatment; knowledge, attitude and practice; validity; reliability

中图分类号:  R47;R197