主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 1142-1146.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.08.005

• 特别策划·康复护理实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

气管切开患者气道康复管理方案的高级护理实践效果评价

倪碧玉 叶静 刘玲 曾晓梅 郑岚 刘祚燕 李磊 芮祖琴 谢国省   

  1. 四川大学华西医院康复医学中心,610041 成都市(倪碧玉,叶静,刘玲,曾晓梅,郑岚,刘祚燕,李磊,谢国省);安徽省皖南康复医院(芜湖市第五人民医院)护理部(芮祖琴)
  • 出版日期:2025-08-15 发布日期:2025-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 谢国省,硕士,副主任护师,E-mail:769602954@qq.com
  • 作者简介:倪碧玉,本科,主管护师
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省芜湖市2024年度市级科技计划项目(2024kj092);皖南医学院自然科学类科研项目(WK2023JXYY140)

Effect of Advanced Nursing Practice in airway rehabilitation management program for patients with tracheostomy

NI Biyu, YE Jing, LIU Ling, ZENG Xiaomei, ZHENG Lan, LIU Zuoyan, LI Lei, RUI Zuqin, XIE Guosheng   

  1. Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
  • Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-15
  • Contact: E-mail:769602954@qq.com

摘要: 目的:评价气管切开患者气道康复管理方案的高级护理实践效果,为促进气管切开患者的康复提供参考。方法:根据现存问题,检索证据,形成气道康复管理措施。采用非同期对照研究方法,便利选取成都市某三级甲等医院2022年9月—12月康复医学中心收治的气管切开患者为对照组(n=26),实施常规气道管理方案,选取2023年9月—12月收治的患者为干预组(n=34),实施气道康复管理方案的高级护理实践。比较两组患者拔管成功率、医疗费用等。结果:干预组气管拔管成功率(32.4%)高于对照组(3.8%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组患者气管切开在院天数、平均住院天数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预组住院费用低于对照组、家属满意度得分高于干预组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:气管切开患者气道康复管理方案的高级护理实践有助于提高拔管成功率,促进多学科合作和循证护理实践,改善患者结局。

关键词: 高级护理实践;气管切开;气道康复管理;拔管成功;康复

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of Advanced Nursing Practice in the airway rehabilitation management program for patients undergoing tracheostomy, providing a reference for promoting the rehabilitation of patients with tracheostomy. Methods: Based on existing issues, evidence was reviewed to develop airway management program. A non-synchronous controlled study was conducted, with 26 patients who underwent tracheostomy at a tertiary grade A hospital in Chengdu from September to December 2022 serving as the control group, and 34 patients from September to December 2023, treated under the Advanced Nursing Practice in airway rehabilitation management program, serving as the intervention group. The success rate of successful extubation, medical expenses, and other aspects between the two groups were compared. Results: The success rate of extubation in the intervention group (32.4%) was higher than that in the control group (3.8%), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the number of days with tracheostomy during hospitalization and the average length of hospital stay (P>0.05). The medical expenses in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group, and the family satisfaction score in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, all with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion: The Advanced Nursing Practice in airway rehabilitation management program for patients undergoing tracheostomy contributes to enhancing the success rate of extubation, facilitating multidisciplinary collaboration and evidence-based nursing practices, and optimizing patient outcomes.

Key words: Advanced Nursing Practice; tracheotomy; airway management; successful extubation; rehabilitation

中图分类号:  R47;R197