主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1737-1742.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.11.025

• 护理质量 • 上一篇    下一篇

经口气管插管患者口腔黏膜压力性损伤预防的证据审查及策略分析

杨鑫晨 张超 龚艳艳 肖威 邓玉璐 谢文广 刘诗琳 黄姝湲 张文豪   

  1. 南昌大学第二附属医院护理部,330008 南昌市(杨鑫晨,张超);神经外科ICU(龚艳艳);南昌大学医学院护理学院(杨鑫晨,肖威,邓玉璐,谢文广,刘诗琳,黄姝湲,张文豪)
  • 出版日期:2025-11-15 发布日期:2025-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 张超,本科,主任护师,护理部副主任,E-mail:931048874@qq.com
  • 作者简介:杨鑫晨,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所一般项目(YLZLXZ23G076)

Evidence review and strategy analysis of the prevention of oral mucosal pressure injury in patients with orotracheal intubation

YANG Xinchen, ZHANG Chao, GONG Yanyan, XIAO Wei, DENG Yulu, XIE Wenguang, LIU Shilin, HUANG Shuyuan, ZHANG Wenhao   

  1. Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330008, China
  • Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-15
  • Contact: E-mail:931048874@qq.com

摘要: 目的:审查经口气管插管患者口腔黏膜压力性损伤预防证据的实施现状,分析障碍与促进因素,为临床实践提供参考。方法:以JBI循证卫生保健模式为理论框架,确定引入临床的证据并构建审查指标,分析证据应用的障碍和促进因素,制定变革策略。结果:共制定21条审查指标,11条指标的执行率<60%,其中,4条指标的执行率为0。循证实践中的主要障碍因素包括科室缺乏口腔黏膜压力性损伤风险评估工具和预防流程、护士相关知识缺乏、科室设备配备不足等,促进因素包括管理层的大力支持、护士参与变革的积极度高等,据此制订了相应的变革策略。结论:本研究制定的审查指标具有科学性、全面性及可操作性,经口气管插管患者口腔黏膜压力性损伤预防证据与临床实践存在较大差距,可针对障碍及促进因素实施临床变革策略,推动证据向临床实践转化。

关键词: 重症监护室;气管插管;口腔黏膜;压力性损伤;证据审查;循证实践

Abstract: Objective: To review the application of evidence for prevention of Oral Mucosal Pressure Injury (OMPI) in patients with orotracheal intubation, analyze the obstacles and promoting factors, to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods: Based on the JBI evidence-based health care model as the theoretical framework, the evidence introduced into clinical practice was determined, the review indicators were constructed, the obstacles and promoting factors of evidence application were analyzed, and the change strategies were formulated. Results: A total of 21 review indicators were developed. However, the implementation rate of 11 indicators was less than 60%, and the implementation rate of 4 indicators was 0. The main obstacles in evidence-based practice included the lack of assessment tools for OMPI risk insufficient prevention procedures, nurses' shortage of relevant knowledge, and inadequate equipment in the department, etc. As to the promotion factors, there were the strong management support and nurses' active participation in the process, according to which the corresponding strategies for change were formulated. Conclusion: The review indicators developed in this study based on the evidence are scientific, comprehensive, and operable. Yet there is still a big gap between the evidence and clinical practice for the prevention of OMPI in patients with orotracheal intubation. Clinical strategies for change can be implemented according to the obstacles and promoting factors to enhance the transformation of the evidence into clinical practice.

Key words: intensive care unit; tracheal intubation; oral mucosal; pressure ulcer; evidence review; evidence-based practice

中图分类号:  R47;R197