主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1686-1692.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.11.016

• 改善护理服务行动专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

医院到家庭标准营养诊疗管理在胰腺癌患者中的应用

章棋 韩娟 王玮荻 肖黎 邹凤林 曹鑫彦 李美玲   

  1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院护理部,430000 武汉市
  • 出版日期:2025-11-15 发布日期:2025-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 韩娟,硕士,副主任护师,专科护士长,E-mail:695630689@qq.com
  • 作者简介:章棋,硕士,主管护师
  • 基金资助:
    2023年同济医院科研基金重点项目(2023D46)

Application of Hospital-to-Home nutrition management based on the Nutrition Care Process Model for pancreatic cancer patients

ZHANG Qi, HAN Juan, WANG Weidi, XIAO Li, ZOU Fenglin, CAO Xinyan, LI Meiling   

  1. Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China
  • Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-15
  • Contact: E-mail:695630689@qq.com

摘要: 目的:评价医院到家庭的标准营养管理在胰腺癌患者中的应用效果,为胰腺癌住院和居家期间的延续性营养管理提供参考。方法:采用便利抽样法,选取2024年3月—9月武汉市某三级甲等医院胆胰外科住院的143例胰腺癌患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为干预组71例与对照组72例。对照组实施常规营养管理,干预组实施医院到家庭标准营养诊疗管理。比较两组患者营养相关指标、口服营养补充依从率、住院时间、生活质量的差异。结果:出院3个月后,干预组营养风险筛查评分、患者主观整体评估量表评分分别为(2.77±0.68)分、(3.75±0.92)分,均低于对照组的(3.12±0.74)分、(4.59±1.14)分(P<0.05);干预组血清白蛋白、前白蛋白、转铁蛋白水平以及BMI均高于对照组(P<0.05);干预组口服营养补充依从率高于对照组(92.96% vs 80.56%,P<0.05);干预组住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05);干预组生活质量评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:医院到家庭标准营养诊疗管理可改善胰腺癌患者的营养状态,提高生活质量。

关键词: 胰腺癌;标准营养诊疗流程;医院到家庭营养管理;生活质量

Abstract: Objective: To explore the application effects of Hospital-to-Home (H2H) nutrition management based on the Nutrition Care Process Model (NCPM) in patients with pancreatic cancer, and to provide reference for the continuous nutrition management during hospitalization and at home for pancreatic cancer patients. Methods: A total of 143 pancreatic cancer patients in a tertiary grade A hospital in Wuhan were recruited through convenience sampling from March to September 2024 and randomly divided into an intervention group of 71 cases and a control group of 72 cases. The control group received conventional nutrition management, while the intervention group received H2H nutrition management based on the NCPM model. The nutritional indicators, compliance rate of Oral Nutritional Supplementation (ONS), hospitalization time, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. Results: After 3 months of discharge, the NRS 2002 score and PG-SGA score of the intervention group were (2.77±0.68) points and (3.75±0.92) points respectively, both lower than those of the control group (3.12±0.74) points and (4.59±1.14) points (P<0.05); the serum albumin, prealbumin, transferrin levels, and BMI of the intervention group were all higher than those of the control group (P<0.05); the ONS compliance rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (92.96% vs 80.56%, P<0.05); the hospitalization time of the intervention group was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05); the EORTC QLQ-C30 score of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The H2H nutrition management based on the NCPM model can improve the nutritional status and the quality of life of pancreatic cancer patients.

Key words: pancreatic cancer; Nutrition Care Process Model; Hospital-to-Home nutrition management; quality of life

中图分类号:  R47;R197