主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1698-1702.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.11.018

• 改善护理服务行动专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京市31家三级甲等医院急诊科静脉血管通路使用及管理的现况调查

宋莉莉 彭可 鲁寒 茹鸿 王蕾   

  1. 北京医院急诊科、国家老年医学中心、中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,100730 北京市(宋莉莉,彭可,鲁寒,茹鸿);科研处(王蕾)
  • 出版日期:2025-11-15 发布日期:2025-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 王蕾,硕士在读,主任护师,副处长,E-mail:haha7106@sina.com
  • 作者简介:宋莉莉,本科,副主任护师,护士长

Current status of intravenous vascular access use and management in emergency departments of 31 tertiary grade A hospitals in Beijing

SONG Lili, PENG Ke, LU Han, RU Hong, WANG Lei   

  1. Emergency Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
  • Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-15
  • Contact: E-mail:haha7106@sina.com

摘要: 目的:调查北京市三级甲等医院急诊科静脉血管通路的使用及管理现状,并分析当前存在的问题,为推动静脉治疗的专业化、规范化管理提供依据。方法:采用便利抽样法,于2024年11月选取北京市31家三级甲等医院急诊科护理管理者或静脉治疗团队负责人进行问卷调查。问卷内容包括急诊科一般资料,静脉血管通路的使用、评估与选择及管理情况。结果:31家医院急诊科均使用外周静脉留置针,14家仍会使用一次性静脉输液钢针,19家使用可视化技术进行静脉通路留置;25家急诊科会评估患者对输液工具的选择偏好,16家在输注血管活性药物时会选择静脉留置针;24家医院急诊科有静脉治疗质量评价标准,4家医院急诊科有静脉治疗信息管理系统。结论:急诊科静脉治疗工具多样,静脉血管通路评估较为全面,但需要加强对血管活性药物静脉治疗的规范。

关键词: 急诊科;静脉血管通路;质量管理;横断面研究

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the current status of intravenous vascular access use and management in emergency departments of tertiary grade A hospitals in Beijing, analyze existing problems, and provide evidence for promoting professional and standardized management of intravenous therapy. Methods: Using a convenience sampling method, a questionnaire survey was conducted among nursing administrators or leaders of intravenous therapy teams in the emergency departments of 31 tertiary hospitals in Beijing in November 2024. A self-designed questionnaire was used, which included general information about the emergency department, the use, evaluation, and selection of vascular access, routine maintenance, and quality management. Results: All 31 emergency departments used peripheral venous indwelling needles, 14 emergency departments still used infusion steel needles, and 19 emergency departments adopted visualization technology for venous access placement; 25 emergency departments assessed patients' preferences for infusion tool selection, and 16 emergency departments chose venous indwelling needles when infusing vasoactive drugs; 24 emergency departments had IV therapy quality evaluation standards, and 4 emergency departments had IV therapy information management systems. Conclusion: Emergency departments have a variety of IV therapy tools and relatively comprehensive venous access assessment, but the standardization of IV therapy for vasoactive drug infusion needs to be strengthened.

Key words: emergency department; intravenous vascular access; quality management; cross-sectional study

中图分类号:  R47;R197