主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生计生委医院管理研究所
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊 中国科技核心期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》入选期刊

Chinese Nursing Management ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 399-406.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.03.017

• Evidence-based Nursing • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Quality evaluation and analysis of domestic nursing experts' consensus literature in the past ten years

CHEN Hongli, ZHANG Ge, ZHAO Qing, ZHU Shuqin, DING Xiaotong, GUO Jingjing, LI Xianwen   

  1. School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, 211166, China
  • Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-03-15
  • Contact: E-mail:xwli0201@njmu.edu.cn

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate and analyze the quality of domestic nursing experts' consensus literature in the past decade. Methods: CNKI, Wanfang Database, and other database were searched by computer, and the gray literature was supplemented. The search time was from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2019. Two researchers screened the domestic nursing experts' opinion and professional consensus literature for nearly ten years, and JBI evidence-based health care center's experts' opinion and professional consensus evaluation tools was used to evaluate the authenticity and quality of literature while the four basic concepts meta-paradigms of nursing keyword analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 16 domestic nursing experts' consensuses were included. As for the results of quality evaluation, for item 1 (source of opinion), item 4 (conclusion basis of analysis, logic of expression) and item 5 (whether referenced literature), the evaluation results were all "Yes". For item 2 (influence of experts), 93.7% of the experts' consensus evaluation results were "Yes", with 6.3% was "No". For item 3 (whether centered on the interests of research-related people), 93.7% of the experts' consensus evaluation results were "Yes", with 6.3% was "Unclear". For the item 6 (whether the opinion was inconsistent with previous literature), 12.5% of the experts' consensus evaluation results were "Yes", with 87.5% was "No". In the keywords analysis of 4 nursing basic concepts keyword, the "human being" related keywords were mostly nursing staff and patients (31.9%, 29.8%) and the "health" related keywords were mostly physical health, health promotion and prevention (40.0%, 28.6%). The "environment" related keywords appeared the least, among which medical institutions were the most (71.4%) and the "nursing" related keywords were the most in the four meta-paradigms. Conclusion: For the source of content of nursing experts' consensus in China is substantive and authentic more real and reliable, less attention was paid to the attributes of nursing. High-quality experts' consensus based on the basic concepts meta-paradigms of nursing are important directions for future attention, in order to play its role as a supplement to evidence-based guidelines better.

Key words: experts' consensus; quality evaluation; nursing meta-paradigmbasic concepts

CLC Number: 

  • R47