主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生计生委医院管理研究所
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊 中国科技核心期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》入选期刊

Chinese Nursing Management ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 38-43.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.01.009

• Research Papers • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire

YIN Xiaomeng, JIANG Yuanyuan, TANG Youyou, ZHANG Yeling, ZHAO Yaling, LIU Qingwei, ZHU Xiuli   

  1. School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, China
  • Online:2020-01-15 Published:2020-01-15
  • Contact: E-mail:15820022927@163.com

Abstract: Objective: To translate and revise the Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire (PTPQ), and test its reliability and validity. Methods: The English version of PTPQ was translated, back-translated, cultural modified and revised based on Brislin translation model. The Chinese version of PTPQ was then applied to 198 patients with advanced cancer to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results: The Chinese version of the PTPQ consisted of two parts, with a total of 17 items. Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 82.513%. The content validity index of each item (I-CVI) in the questionnaire was 0.80-1.00, and the average content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.91. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.845, the Cronbach's α of each factor was 0.688-0.956, and the Guttman's half-fold reliability coefficient was 0.867. Conclusion: The Chinese version of PTPQ has good reliability and validity, and it can effectively evaluate the prognosis and treatment cognition of advanced cancer patients for clinical medical staff in China.

Key words: Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire; advanced cancer patients; reliability; validity

CLC Number: 

  • R47