近10年国内护理专家共识文献质量评价与分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.03.017

中国护理管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 399-406.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.03.017

近10年国内护理专家共识文献质量评价与分析

陈红丽张戈赵青朱姝芹丁晓彤郭晶晶李现文

南京医科大学护理学院，211166（陈红丽，赵青，朱姝芹，丁晓彤，郭晶晶，李现文）；南京市脑科医院，南京医科大学附属脑科医院（张戈）

出版日期:2020-03-15 发布日期:2020-03-15
通讯作者: 李现文，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，E-mail:xwli0201@njmu.edu.cn
作者简介:陈红丽，本科在读
基金资助:
江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目（2017SJB0285）；江苏省高校优势学科建设工程项目

Quality evaluation and analysis of domestic nursing experts' consensus literature in the past ten years

CHEN Hongli, ZHANG Ge, ZHAO Qing, ZHU Shuqin, DING Xiaotong, GUO Jingjing, LI Xianwen

School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, 211166, China

Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-03-15
Contact: E-mail:xwli0201@njmu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：对近10年国内护理专家共识进行文献质量评价及分析。方法：计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库等数据库，同时补充检索灰色文献；检索时限为2009年1月1日至2019年6月30日，筛选近10年国内护理专家意见与专业共识文献，由2名研究人员利用JBI循证卫生保健中心专家意见与专业共识类文章的评价工具进行文献内容真实性质量评价；利用护理学4个基本概念对文献进行关键词分析。结果：共纳入16篇国内护理专家共识。质量评价结果中，条目1（观点来源）、条目4（结论分析基础、表达逻辑性）、条目5（文献参考与否），其评价结果均为“是”；条目2（专家影响力），93.7%的专家共识评价结果为“是”，6.3%为“否”；条目3（是否以研究相关的人群利益为中心），93.7%的专家共识评价结果为“是”，6.3%为“不清楚”；条目6（观点与以往文献是否不一致），12.5%的专家共识评价结果为“是”，87.5%为“否”。护理学4个基本概念的关键词分析中，“人”相关关键词以护理人员及患者为主（31.9%、29.8%）；“健康”相关关键词以躯体健康、健康促进及预防居多（40.0%、28.6%）；“环境”相关关键词出现最少，以医疗机构为主（71.4%）；“护理”相关关键词在4个基本概念中出现最多。结论：我国护理专家共识内容来源较为真实可靠，但较少关注护理学学科属性；高质量、基于护理学基本概念的专家共识是今后需要关注的重要方向，从而更好地发挥其作为循证指南的补充作用。

关键词: 专家共识；质量评价；护理学基本概念

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate and analyze the quality of domestic nursing experts' consensus literature in the past decade. Methods: CNKI, Wanfang Database, and other database were searched by computer, and the gray literature was supplemented. The search time was from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2019. Two researchers screened the domestic nursing experts' opinion and professional consensus literature for nearly ten years, and JBI evidence-based health care center's experts' opinion and professional consensus evaluation tools was used to evaluate the authenticity and quality of literature while the four basic concepts meta-paradigms of nursing keyword analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 16 domestic nursing experts' consensuses were included. As for the results of quality evaluation, for item 1 (source of opinion), item 4 (conclusion basis of analysis, logic of expression) and item 5 (whether referenced literature), the evaluation results were all "Yes". For item 2 (influence of experts), 93.7% of the experts' consensus evaluation results were "Yes", with 6.3% was "No". For item 3 (whether centered on the interests of research-related people), 93.7% of the experts' consensus evaluation results were "Yes", with 6.3% was "Unclear". For the item 6 (whether the opinion was inconsistent with previous literature), 12.5% of the experts' consensus evaluation results were "Yes", with 87.5% was "No". In the keywords analysis of 4 nursing basic concepts keyword, the "human being" related keywords were mostly nursing staff and patients (31.9%, 29.8%) and the "health" related keywords were mostly physical health, health promotion and prevention (40.0%, 28.6%). The "environment" related keywords appeared the least, among which medical institutions were the most (71.4%) and the "nursing" related keywords were the most in the four meta-paradigms. Conclusion: For the source of content of nursing experts' consensus in China is substantive and authentic more real and reliable, less attention was paid to the attributes of nursing. High-quality experts' consensus based on the basic concepts meta-paradigms of nursing are important directions for future attention, in order to play its role as a supplement to evidence-based guidelines better.

Key words: experts' consensus; quality evaluation; nursing meta-paradigmbasic concepts

中图分类号:

陈红丽张戈赵青朱姝芹丁晓彤郭晶晶李现文. 近10年国内护理专家共识文献质量评价与分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(3): 399-406.

CHEN Hongli, ZHANG Ge, ZHAO Qing, ZHU Shuqin, DING Xiaotong, GUO Jingjing, LI Xianwen. Quality evaluation and analysis of domestic nursing experts' consensus literature in the past ten years[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2020, 20(3): 399-406.

[1]	刘珍张艳董树美周树红赵敬李宏洁杜灿灿田雨同. 远程健康照护准备度量表的汉化及信度效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1154-1158.
[2]	张楠韩月皎苏莉莉王亚菲王妍刘峰. 儿童肠造口延续性护理现状及研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1183-1187.
[3]	王娴张瑞丽温鹏天李慧娟吴景梅. 基于Andersen行为模型的社区老年人使用日间照料中心的影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1187-1191.
[4]	刘莹张懿周裕婧. 养老机构护士灵性照顾能力及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1220-1224.
[5]	祝红梅江华卢言慧张光鹏李明子. 北京市6所三级医院高年资护士职业高原现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1204-1210.
[6]	冯月李俊英. PICC相关性静脉血栓风险评估工具在肿瘤患者中应用的有效性研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1258-1262.
[7]	徐忠梅刘芳常芸陈玉红沈莹吴娟. 心血管专科护士创新行为现状及其与信息素养的关系[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1211-1215.
[8]	耿玉芳周利华王维利. 文化智力影响临床护士整合-冲突处理模式的中介效应分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1215-1219.
[9]	张会敏高杰孙羽燕张楠张俊蕾唐四元. 某精神病院精神科护士人文关怀能力现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1224-1227.
[10]	孙雪莲高文慧李思颉陈婷梁潇. 工作实录分析联合情景模拟演练在突发群体伤救护中的应用效果[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1228-1231.
[11]	姚秀钰程艮杨磊. 我国男护士执业现状和职业认知的调查分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1232-1235.
[12]	郭桂丽韩斌如董婷婷. SSKIN集束化护理措施对院内压力性损伤预防效果的研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1241-1244.
[13]	王煜马洪升戴燕唐孟言刘洋. 日间手术患者对围术期管理移动医疗手机应用软件需求的调查分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1236-1241.
[14]	赵礼婷郭金玉韩玮芬田丽莎王泠. 发展性反馈管理在预防急诊抢救区患者院内压力性损伤中的应用效果[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1245-1248.
[15]	乐霄刘于柯键于明峰张文艳. 儿童患者呼吸道护理诊断精确性临床指征研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(8): 1249-1253.

近10年国内护理专家共识文献质量评价与分析

Quality evaluation and analysis of domestic nursing experts' consensus literature in the past ten years

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10