主管：国家卫生健康委员会
主办：国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊（中国科技论文统计源期刊）
中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (10): 1513-1518.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.10.016

• 护理质量 • 上一篇    下一篇

小肠移植围手术期护理质量评价指标体系的构建

卢芳燕 张婉莹 宋运莲 王燕 戴燕红 王华芬   

  1. 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院护理部/肝胆胰外科，310003 杭州市 （卢芳燕）；肝移植中心（张婉莹，宋运莲，王燕， 戴燕红）；护理部（王华芬）
  • 出版日期:2022-10-15 发布日期:2022-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 王华芬，硕士，主任护师，护理部主任，E-mail:2185015@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:卢芳燕，硕士，副主任护师，护理部副主任
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省卫生健康科技计划项目（2021KY690）

Construction of nursing quality evaluation indicator system in perioperative period of small intestine transplantation

LU Fangyan, ZHANG Wanying, SONG Yunlian, WANG Yan, DAI Yanhong, WANG Huafen   

  1. Department of Nursing, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, China
  • Online:2022-10-15 Published:2022-10-15
  • Contact: E-mail:2185015@zju.edu.cn

PDF (PC)

148

赞

摘要： 目的：构建小肠移植围手术期护理质量评价指标体系，为小肠移植围手术期护理质量监测及评价提供标准、可量化的依据。方法：以Donabedian的“结构-过程-结果”三维质量评价模型为理论框架，采用文献分析、德尔菲法及层次分析法，确定小肠移植围手术期护理质量评价指标体系的内容及各指标权重。结果：2轮专家函询问卷的有效回收率均为100%，专家权威系数均为0.88，变异系数为0～0.235和0～0.201，肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.105和0.187（均P<0.001）。最终构建的小肠移植围手术期护理质量评价指标体系包括一级指标3项、二级指标11项、三级指标66项。结论：构建的小肠移植围手术期护理质量评价指标体系具有较高的科学性和可靠性，可为小肠移植围手术期护理质量评价提供参考。

关键词: 器官移植；小肠；围手术期护理；质量评价研究；德尔菲法

Abstract: Objective: To construct an evaluation indicator system for perioperative nursing quality of small intestine transplantation, and to provide a standard and quantifiable basis for monitoring and evaluation of perioperative nursing quality in small intestine transplantation. Methods: This study was conducted based on the frame work of Donabedian's three-dimensional "structure-process-outcome" quality model, using literature review, Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process to determine the content of the system, and the weight of each indicator. Results: The effective recovery rates of two rounds of expert consultation questionnaires were 100%. The authority coefficients were 0.88. The variation coefficients were 0-0.235 and 0-0.201. The Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.105 and 0.187 (P<0.001). The final evaluation indicator system for perioperative nursing quality in small intestine transplantation included 3 first-level indicators, 11 second-lever indicators and 66 third-level indicators. Conclusion: The evaluation indicator system for perioperative nursing quality in small intestine transplantation is scientific and reliable, which can provide references for the evaluation of perioperative nursing quality in small intestine transplantation.

Key words: organ transplantation; small intestine; perioperative nursing; quality evaluation research; Delphi method

中图分类号:  R47；R197
版权所有 © 《中国护理管理》杂志社   京公网安备 11010202005821号   京ICP备11024163号


本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发