主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 613-619.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.04.026

• 专科管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于ICF框架的冠心病患者心脏康复护理评估类目的Rasch模型分析

陈莹莹 黎万汇 江莹 康晓凤 马晶 李海燕   

  1. 北京协和医学院护理学院,100144 北京市(陈莹莹,黎万汇,江莹,康晓凤);解放军总医院第一医学中心心血管内科(马晶,李海燕)
  • 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 康晓凤,博士,副教授,E-mail:xfkangpumc@126.com
  • 作者简介:陈莹莹,硕士在读

Psychometric properties of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories for patients following cardiac rehabilitation based on Rasch analysis

CHEN Yingying, LI Wanhui, JIANG Ying, KANG Xiaofeng, MA Jing, LI Haiyan   

  1. School of Nursing, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100144, China
  • Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-15
  • Contact: E-mail:xfkangpumc@126.com

摘要: 目的:旨在基于Rasch模型分析冠心病心脏康复护理相关《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(Inter-national Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health,ICF)类目的测量学特征。方法:通过便利抽样选取100例冠心病心脏康复患者,对其采用冠心病心脏康复护理相关ICF类目和简明生活质量量表(the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey,SF-36)进行调查,运用Winsteps 3.66.0软件对每一类目进行测量学检验,统计指标包括单维性检验、类目拟合度、个人和项目分离信度。结果:共58个心脏康复护理评估类目,包括“身体功能”(23个类目)、“身体结构”(2个类目)、“活动与参与”(17个类目)、“环境因素”(16个类目)4个维度。总类目的Cronbac h’s?α系数为0.879,各类目拟合度较高,各维度项目分离信度分别为0.95、0.96、0.91、0.94,与SF-36具有较高的同时效度。结论:冠心病心脏康复护理评估类目具有较好的心理测量学属性,可有效评价心脏康复患者的健康状况。

关键词: ICF;检查表;心脏康复;护理;Rasch分析

Abstract: Objective: To construct a clinical instrument to measure functioning of patients following cardiac rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories based on a Rasch analysis. Methods: A convenience sampling was used to conduct the questionnaire survey in a cardiac rehabilitation center. Psychometric properties were evaluated in 100 patients with CHD using Rasch analysis, such as unidimensionality, the person-and item-separation reliability and fit of ICF categories by Winsteps. Results: The Rasch refinement led to a 58-item scale. Rasch reliabilities were 0.95 (23-item body function scale), 0.96 (2-item body structures scale), 0.91 (17-item activity and participation), and 0.94 (16-item environmental factors scale). The overall Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.879. The ICF categories for patients following cardiac rehabilitation correlated well with SF-36. Conclusion: The ICF categories for patients following cardiac rehabilitation is a reliable and valid questionnaire based on the ICF checklist. It allows measurement of functioning as a unidimensional construct in patients following cardiac rehabilitation.

Key words: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; checklist; cardiac rehabilitation; nursing; Rasch analysis

中图分类号:  R47