主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 161-166.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.02.001

• 特别策划·质性研究可信赖度提升 •    下一篇

护理质性研究的可信赖度现状及提升技术分析

王红红 赵地 赵晓敏 肖雪玲   

  1. 中南大学湘雅护理学院,410013 长沙市
  • 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 肖雪玲,博士,讲师,E-mail:xuelingxiao93@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:王红红,博士,教授,博士生导师

Analysis of the status quo of the trustworthiness of nursing qualitative research and its improvement technology

WANG Honghong, ZHAO Di, ZHAO Xiaomin, XIAO Xueling   

  1. Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China
  • Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-15
  • Contact: E-mail:xuelingxiao93@hotmail.com

摘要: 目的:分析护理质性研究可信赖度现状并探讨可信赖度水平提升技术,为提高护理质性研究的质量提供证据。方法:在中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台系统检索中国科学引文数据库中的5本我国护理期刊近5年发表的质性研究,结合质性研究报告规范要求对符合纳入标准的文章进行分析。结果:经筛选获得389篇文章,发现94.9%的文章阐述了提升研究质量的1种或者多种技术,其中运用较多的技术包括成员审核及合众法。对照质性研究报告规范,目前提升质性研究可信赖度技术的使用流于字面的简单描述,对提升可信赖度技术的报告欠规范,现有质性研究的设计和资料分析方法的报告欠清晰。结论:本文结合现存问题和实例阐述了提升文章可信赖度的常用技术,呼吁研究者深入理解质性研究报告规范和提升可信赖度的技术,以确保技术的使用贯穿始终,从而提升护理质性研究质量。

关键词: 质性研究;可信赖度;报告规范;护理研究

Abstract: bjective: To analyze the status trustworthiness of current qualitative studies. Methods: We systematically searched two databases (CNKI and WangFang Data) for the qualitative studies published in 5 Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) nursing journals in the recent 5 years. Based on the standards for reporting qualitative studies, we included and analyzed the studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Results: We obtained 389 qualitative studies and found that 94.9% of the included qualitative articles reported one or more methods to address the rigor of the research. The most common method was member check and triangulation. Compared with the standard of qualitative research reports, the current use of techniques for improving the trustworthiness of qualitative research is a literal and simple description, the reporting of techniques for improving the trustworthiness of qualitative research is not standardized, and the reporting of existing qualitative research design and data analysis methods is insufficient clear. Conclusion: Based on these issues, we illustrates the commonly used strategies for boosting trustworthiness of qualitative studies with examples. We advocate the researchers to deeply understand standards for reporting qualitative study and strategies to improve the trustworthiness to ensure that the strategies will be adopted through the whole process of the research to improve the research quality.

Key words: qualitative study; trustworthiness; reporting standards; nursing research

中图分类号:  R47