主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (11): 1639-1642.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.11.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文版3分钟谵妄诊断量表在ICU患者中应用的信度效度评价

李立群 王建宁 江榕 詹梦梅 江丽玲 朱欢欢   

  1. 南昌大学第一附属医院护理部,330006 南昌市(李立群,王建宁,江榕,詹梦梅);赣南医学院第一附属医院生殖医学科(江丽玲);南昌大学研究生院(朱欢欢)
  • 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2021-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 王建宁,硕士,主任护师,护理部主任,E-mail:wjnhx9@126.com
  • 作者简介:李立群,硕士,护师
  • 基金资助:
    江西省卫生健康委员会科技计划(202110031)

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for CAM-defined Delirium in ICU patients

LI Liqun, WANG Jianning, JIANG Rong, ZHAN Mengmei, JIANG Liling, ZHU Huanhuan   

  1. Nursing Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China
  • Online:2021-11-15 Published:2021-11-15
  • Contact: E-mail:wjnhx9@126.com

摘要: 目的:评价中文版3分钟谵妄诊断量表(3D-CAM)用于ICU患者谵妄评估的信度、效度及适用性。方法:采用便利抽样法,选取2019年9月—10月在南昌大学第一附属医院的150例ICU患者为研究对象。以美国精神疾病诊断标准DSM-V为金标准检验3D-CAM对ICU患者谵妄的评估效度;由两名护士独立使用3D-CAM对其中随机抽取的55例患者进行评估,检验其评估者间信度。结果:150名调查对象41.3%用DSM-V诊断为谵妄,38.0%用3D-CAM诊断为谵妄,两者结果一致性Kappa值为0.736(P<0.01)。与金标准相比,3D-CAM的灵敏度为87.7%(95%CI 75.5%~94.5%),特异度为87.1%(95%CI 78.2%~92.9%),阳性预测值为80.6%(95%CI 68.3%~89.2%),阴性预测值为92.0%(95%CI 83.8%~96.5%)。评估者间总一致性Kappa值为0.845(P<0.001),其中4个诊断特征(急性起病或波动性改变、注意力不集中、思维混乱和意识水平改变)的评估者间一致性Kappa值分别为0.777、0.809、0.791和0.829(P<0.001)。结论:3D-CAM用于ICU患者谵妄评估有较好的信度、效度,其具有无须特殊培训、评估快捷、灵敏度高等特点,适合非精神专科背景的医护人员使用。

关键词: 谵妄;重症监护室;3分钟谵妄诊断量表;灵敏度;特异度

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for CAM-defined Delirium (3D-CAM) for delirium assessment in ICU patients and its applicability. Methods: We selected 150 ICU patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from September to October 2019 as the research participants by convenience sampling method, and chose DSM-V as the gold standard to test the validity of 3D-CAM in delirium assessment of ICU patients. Two nurses independently evaluated 55 randomly selected patients with 3D-CAM, and using the inter-evaluator reliability to test their reliability. Results: Delirium was diagnosed with a positive rate of 41.3% by DSM-V, while by 3D-CAM, the positive rate was 38.0%, the Kappa was 0.736 (P<0.01). Compared with gold standard, the sensitivity of 3D-CAM was 87.7% (95%CI 75.5%-94.5%), specificity was 87.1% (95%CI 78.2%-92.9%), PPV was 80.6% (95%CI 68.3%-89.2%), NPV was 92.0% (95%CI 83.8%-96.5%). The reliability study included 55 patients, and the overall consistency of Kappa among raters was 0.845 (P<0.001), the consistent Kappa values of the four diagnostic features (acute onset or fluctuation change, inattention, confusion of thinking and change of consciousness level) were 0.777, 0.809, 0.791 and 0.829 (P<0.001). Conclusion: 3D-CAM has good reliability and validity in delirium assessment of ICU patients. It is characterized by no need for special training, quick assessment and high sensitivity, and is suitable for medical staff with non-psychiatric background.

Key words: delirium; ICU; 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for CAM-defined Delirium; sensitivity; specificity

中图分类号: 

  • R47