主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 831-835.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.06.007

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

死亡自我效能量表的汉化及在肿瘤科护士中应用的信度效度检验

郑瑞双 郭巧红 董凤齐 高丽 谌永毅 王治英 尚美美 闯冬梅 王龙   

  1. 天津医科大学肿瘤医院肝胆肿瘤科,300060 天津市(郑瑞双,董凤齐);首都医科大学护理学院(郭巧红,高丽);湖南省肿瘤医院护理部(谌永毅);海南省肿瘤医院护理部(王治英);山东省肿瘤医院护理部(尚美美);北京世纪坛医院干部心血管科(闯冬梅);河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科(王龙)
  • 出版日期:2020-06-15 发布日期:2020-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭巧红,博士,副教授,E-mail:792703081@qq.com E-mail:E-mail:zrs3225@126.com
  • 作者简介:郑瑞双,硕士,主管护师,E-mail:zrs3225@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(81803102)

Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Death Self-Efficacy Scale among oncology nurses

ZHENG Ruishuang, GUO Qiaohong, DONG Fengqi, GAO Li, CHEN Yongyi, WANG Zhiying, SHANG Meimei, CHUANG Dongmei, WANG Long   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, 300060, China
  • Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-06-15
  • Contact: E-mail:792703081@qq.com E-mail:E-mail:zrs3225@126.com

摘要: 目的:翻译并修订死亡自我效能量表,并对修订后的量表进行信度、效度检验。方法:采用Brislin翻译模式对该量表进行翻译和回译;通过专家组讨论和预调查对翻译后的量表进行跨文化调适。采用便利抽样法,选取全国7所医院的755名肿瘤科护士进行调查并评价该量表的信度、效度。结果:中文版死亡自我效能量表总的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.942,I-CVI为0.83~1.00,S-CVI/Ave为0.98,折半信度为0.834,重测信度为0.997;探索性因子共提取出5个因子,累计方差贡献率为60.84%。5个维度包括“日常生活和工作”“应对他人死亡”“死亡准备行为”“照护临终病人和家属”和“濒死和死亡后躯体护理”。结论:中文版死亡自我效能量表适用于中国文化背景,具有良好的信度、效度。

关键词: 肿瘤科护士;死亡自我效能;文化调适;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To translate and test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Death Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) among oncology nurses. Methods: The Death Self-Efficacy Scale was translated into Chinese according to the guideline of Brislin Translation Model. Then, the translated version was further adapted based on the results of the expert discussion and pilot study. A total of 755 oncology nurses from seven hospitals in China were recruited and the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the DSES was examined. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.942. The item-level content validity index of the Chinese DSES was 0.83-1.00, and the scale-level content validity index/average agreement was 0.98. The split-half coefficient was 0.834, and the test-retest reliability 0.997. Five factors were extracted using exploratory factor analysis which could explain 60.84% of the variance of Death Self-Efficacy. The five factors were named as: daily life and work, being prepared for one's own death,dealing with others' death, caring for dying patients and family members, and physical care around patient death. Conclusion: The Chinese version of DSES showed good validity and reliability, and it can be used among oncology nurses to evaluate their level of the Death Self-Efficacy.

Key words: oncology nurses; Death Self-Efficacy; cultural adjustment; validity; reliability

中图分类号: 

  • R47