主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 681-686.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.05.009

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

护士个人—工作匹配量表的汉化及信度效度检验

李姗姗 卜晓佳 刘曼 刘婷 孙黎惠 单信芝   

  1. 青岛大学护理学院,266000 山东省(李姗姗,刘曼,刘婷);青岛大学附属医院(卜晓佳,孙黎惠,单信芝)
  • 出版日期:2020-05-15 发布日期:2020-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 单信芝,硕士,副主任护师,护理部副主任,E-mail:sxzdragon@126.com
  • 作者简介:李姗姗,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    2018年青岛大学医学部“临床医学+X”工程科研项目(2018-56)

Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Areas of Worklife Scale among nurses

LI Shanshan, BU Xiaojia, LIU Man, LIU Ting, SUN Lihui, SHAN Xinzhi   

  1. School of Nursing, Qingdao University, 266000, China
  • Online:2020-05-15 Published:2020-05-15
  • Contact: E-mail:sxzdragon@126.com

摘要: 目的:对个人—工作匹配量表(Areas of Worklife Scale,AWS)进行汉化并验证其信度、效度。方法:获得原作者授权同意后,以Brislin翻译模型为基础,采用两人翻译—回译法,通过专家小组评议和跨文化调试,形成中文版AWS。采用便利抽样法选取青岛市3所三级甲等综合医院500名护士进行问卷调查并进行条目分析和信度、效度检验。结果:所有条目的决断值CR在11.958~42.776之间,条目与所对应维度得分的相关系数为0.561~0.819。量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.894,各维度的Cronbach’s α系数为0.715~0.922,整个量表的分半信度为0.738,各维度的分半信度为0.702~0.948,整个量表重测信度为0.850,各个维度重测信度为0.710~0.900;AWS量表水平的内容效度指数为0.933;中文版AWS量表共提取6个公因子,解释方差贡献率为65.979%,验证性因子分析结果显示适配度良好。结论:汉化后的AWS量表具有良好的信度、效度,可有效反映被测护士个人—工作匹配现状。

关键词: 护士;个人—工作匹配量表;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To culturally adapt and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version Areas of Worklife Scale (AWS). Methods: The AWS was translated and adapted according to the standard forward-back translation techniques. Five-hundred nurses from three tertiary hospitals in Qingdao were selected to finish the scale. Item analysis and reliability and validity test were carried out. Results: The critical ratios of all items were between 11.958 and 42.776. The correlation coefficient were between 0.561 and 0.819. Internal consistency of the whole scale was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.894. The Cronbach's α of six subscales were between 0.715 and 0.922. The split-half reliability was 0.738 for the whole scale and 0.702-0.948 for its subscales. The test-retest reliability was 0.850 for the whole scale and 0.710-0.900 for its subscales. The content validity index was 0.933 for the whole scale. Six factors were extracted from the scale by exploratory factor analysis. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 65.979%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit was good. Conclusion: The Chinese version of AWS shows good reliability and validity, and can be used as a valid tool to assess the areas of worklife of nurses in China.

Key words: nurses; Areas of Worklife Scale; reliability; validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47