主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 1524-1529.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.10.017

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

失禁相关性皮炎风险预测模型的系统评价与Meta分析

曹旭 王泠 刘秋月 张鹍   

  1. 北京大学人民医院保健病房,100044 北京市(曹旭,刘秋月);血液科(张鹍);怀来院区(王泠)
  • 出版日期:2025-10-15 发布日期:2025-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 王泠,硕士,硕士生导师,主任护师,怀来院区执行院长,E-mail:wanglingyaoyao@sina.com
  • 作者简介:曹旭,硕士,主管护师,护士长

Risk prediction models for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

CAO Xu, WANG Ling, LIU Qiuyue, ZHANG Kun   

  1. Healthcare Ward, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
  • Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-15
  • Contact: E-mail:wanglingyaoyao@sina.com

摘要: 目的:系统评价失禁相关性皮炎的风险预测模型,为相关预测模型的构建及临床实践提供参考。方法:系统检索中英文数据库中与失禁相关性皮炎风险预测模型相关的文献,检索时限为建库至2025年3月17日。由2名研究者独立进行文献筛选、资料提取,并应用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具评估研究的方法学质量。结果:纳入7项研究,共构建8个失禁相关性皮炎风险预测模型,纳入模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积在0.810~0.904之间,灵敏度为60.9%~99.4%,特异度为79.41%~96.7%,模型呈现形式以公式法为主。最常见的预测因子包括:年龄[OR=1.52,95%CI(1.16,2.00)]、血清白蛋白水平[OR=2.35,95%CI(1.75,3.16)]、大便次数[OR=3.21,95%CI(2.45,4.20)]。结论:失禁相关性皮炎风险预测模型的研究尚处于发展阶段,未来的研究应完善研究设计和报告流程,并对现有模型进行验证,进一步评估模型在临床实践中的有效性和可行性,促进研究向临床转化,为患者制定精准化方案,从而减少失禁相关性皮炎的发生。

关键词: 失禁相关性皮炎;风险预测模型;Meta分析

Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate risk prediction models for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD), providing references for the development of such models and clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in Chinese and English databases for literature on risk prediction models for IAD, with the search period spanning from database inception to March 17, 2025. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Results: Seven studies were included, comprising a total of eight IAD risk prediction models. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the models ranged from 0.810 to 0.904, with sensitivity of 60.9%–99.4% and specificity of 79.41%–96.7%. Most models were presented as formula-based. The most common predictive factors included: age [OR=1.52, 95%CI (1.16, 2.00)], serum albumin level [OR=2.35, 95%CI (1.75, 3.16)], and frequency of bowel movements [OR=3.21, 95%CI (2.45, 4.20)]. Conclusion: Research on IAD risk prediction models is still in the developmental stage. Future studies should refine design and reporting protocols, validate existing models, and further evaluate their clinical applicability and effectiveness to facilitate translation into practice. This will enable personalized interventions to reduce IAD incidence.

Key words: Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis; risk prediction model; Meta-analysis

中图分类号:  R47;R197