主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 1493-1498.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.10.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

植入心律转复除颤器患者自我效能期望及结局期望量表的汉化及信度效度检验

张向毅 祝捷 张晓欣 裴志怡 林佳艺 袁志怡 贾烨如 郝甜 康晓凤   

  1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院护理学院,100144 北京市(张向毅,张晓欣,裴志怡,林佳艺,袁志怡,贾烨如,康晓凤);中国医学科学院阜外医院心律失常三病区(祝捷,郝甜)
  • 出版日期:2025-10-15 发布日期:2025-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 康晓凤,博士,教授,E-mail:xfkangpumc@126.com;郝甜,本科,主管护师,E-mail:zhaoyu197575@sina.com
  • 作者简介:张向毅,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    中国医学科学院阜外医院2024年护理专项立项课题(HLZX2024015)

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Expectations and Outcome Expectations after ICD Implantation Scales in patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device

ZHANG Xiangyi, ZHU Jie, ZHANG Xiaoxin, PEI Zhiyi, LIN Jiayi, YUAN Zhiyi, JIA Yeru, HAO Tian, KANG Xiaofeng   

  1. School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100144, China
  • Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-15
  • Contact: E-mail:xfkangpumc@126.com;E-mail:zhaoyu197575@sina.com

摘要: 目的:检验中文版植入心律转复除颤器患者自我效能期望及结局期望量表(Self-Efficacy Expectations and Outcome Expectations after ICD Implantation Scales,SEOE-ICD)在心脏电子设备植入人群中应用的信度和效度,为该人群期望的评估提供参考。方法:遵循量表引进原则,对量表进行汉化;于2024年3月—12月采用便利抽样法纳入205例北京市某三级甲等医院心律失常病房行心脏电子设备植入术的患者为调查对象,使用中文版SEOE-ICD、一般自我效能量表、治疗期望问卷、Florida患者接受度调查表进行测试;采用验证性因子分析、多质多法、内部一致性分析对量表进行信度和效度评价。结果:中文版SEOE-ICD共包括自我效能期望与结局期望两个子量表,13个条目;验证性因子模型适配度指标表现良好(χ2/df=2.929,TLI=0.951,CFI=0.961,SRMR=0.042,RMSEA=0.097);多质多法分析显示量表有较好的聚合效度及区分效度;两个子量表的Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.949、0.878。结论:中文版SEOE-ICD在心脏电子设备植入人群中应用的信度、效度良好,可作为该人群期望的评估工具,为健康策略制定提供有效依据。

关键词: 心脏植入式电子设备;自我效能期望;结局期望;多质多法

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Expectations and Outcome Expectations after ICD Implantation Scales (SEOE-ICD) in patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device (CIED). Methods: The original scale was translated according to the FACIT translation method. From March to December 2024, totally 205 patients with CIED were recruited from the arrhythmia ward of one tertiary grade A hospital in Beijing. Tests were conducted using the SEOE-ICD, the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), the Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q), and the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS). Confirmatory factor analysis, Multi-Trait Multi-Method (MTMM) analysis and internal consistency analysis were used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the scale. Results: The scale consisted of two parts: self-efficacy expectations and outcome expectations, with a total of 13 items. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model yielded a reasonable fit:?χ2/df=2.929, TLI=0.951, CFI=0.961, SRMR=0.042, RMSEA=0.097. MTMM analysis showed that the scale had high convergent validity and discriminant validity. The Cronbach's α coefficients of the two sub-scales were 0.949 and 0.878, respectively. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the SEOE-ICD has good reliability and validity in patients with CIED. This scale can assess the expectation level of this population and provide theoretical support for the intervention.

Key words: Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device; self-efficacy expectations; outcome expectations; Multi-Trait Multi-Method

中图分类号:  R47;R197