主管：国家卫生健康委员会
主办：国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊（中国科技论文统计源期刊）
中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 696-701.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.05.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

继发性创伤后成长评定量表的汉化及信度效度检验

朱宏梅 胡安妮 张萍 杜华 韩江英 荚娟华 胡雨航   

  1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院急诊科，230088 合肥市（朱宏梅，胡安妮，荚娟华，胡雨航）；肿瘤放疗科（杜华）；护理部（韩江英）；南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院心脏外科（张萍）
  • 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 胡安妮，硕士，护师，E-mail:han09082021@163.com
  • 作者简介:朱宏梅，硕士，副主任护师，护士长
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高等学校省级质量工程项目（2023jyxm1099）；安徽医科大学校科研基金项目（2023xkj275）；中国心理卫生协会护理心理专业委员会课题（22-23-104）

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Secondary Posttraumatic Growth Inventory

ZHU Hongmei, HU Anni, ZHANG Ping, DU Hua, HAN Jiangying, JIA Juanhua, HU Yuhang   

  1. Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230088, China
  • Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-15
  • Contact: E-mail:han09082021@163.com

PDF (PC)

32

赞

摘要： 目的：汉化继发性创伤后成长评定量表（Secondary Posttraumatic Growth Inventory，SPTGI），并在临床护士中检验其信度和效度，为评估我国护士的继发性创伤后成长水平提供测量工具。方法：基于Brislin翻译模型，通过正译、回译、文化调试和预调查对SPTGI进行汉化。采取便利抽样法，于2023年11月至2024年8月选取安徽省某三级甲等医院543名临床护士进行调查，进行项目分析、探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析和信度检验。结果：中文版SPTGI包括4个维度，12个条目。量表的全体一致内容效度指数为0.833，各条目的内容效度指数为0.750～1.000。探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子，累计方差贡献率为77.490%；验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好。总量表的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.899，各维度的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.793～0.881，总量表的重测信度为0.883。结论：中文版SPTGI在临床护士中具有良好的信度和效度，可作为评估国内临床护士继发性创伤后成长的有效工具。

关键词: 继发性创伤后成长；量表汉化；信度；效度；护士

Abstract: Objective: To translate the Secondary Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (SPTGI) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity among clinical nurses, providing a reliable tool for assessing secondary posttraumatic growth in nurses in China. Methods: The SPTGI was adapted to Chinese through forward translation, back translation, cultural adaptation, and pre-testing, according to the Brislin translation model. A total of 543 clinical nurses from a tertiary grade A hospital in Anhui province were investigated using convenience sampling method from November 2023 to August 2024. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability testing were conducted. Results: The Chinese version of the SPTGI included four dimensions with 12 items. The content validity index for the scale was 0.833, with item-specific content validity indices ranging from 0.750-1.000. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure, explaining 77.490% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the entire scale was 0.899, and the Cronbach’s α coefficient for each dimensions was 0.793-0.881. Test-retest reliability for the total scale was 0.883. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the SPTGI demonstrates strong reliability and validity among clinical nurses and can serve as an effective tool to evaluate the secondary posttraumatic growth of clinical nurses in China.

Key words: secondary posttraumatic growth; scale sinicization; reliability; validity; nurse

中图分类号:  R47；R197
版权所有 © 《中国护理管理》杂志社   京公网安备 11010202005821号   京ICP备11024163号


本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发