主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 680-684.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.05.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

心脏起搏器植入术后患者康复护理的效果研究

何叶 马芳芳 吴楠 付静 余旻虹   

  1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医院心脏加强病房,100730 北京市(何叶,马芳芳);心内科(吴楠,付静);血液内科(余旻虹)
  • 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 余旻虹,本科,副主任护师,护士长,E-mail:rainbowyu73@sina.com
  • 作者简介:何叶,硕士,主管护师,教学老师
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(3332023016)

Effect of rehabilitation nursing for patients after cardiac pacemaker implantation

HE Ye, MA Fangfang, WU Nan, FU Jing, YU Minhong   

  1. Cardiac Intensive Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
  • Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-15
  • Contact: E-mail:rainbowyu73@sina.com

摘要: 目的:分析基于健康行动过程取向理论的康复护理在心脏起搏器植入术后患者中的应用效果,以期提升患者康复效率。方法:采用便利抽样法,选取2023年7月至2024年2月于北京市某三级甲等医院行心脏起搏器植入术后的154例患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和干预组,两组各77例。对照组采用常规护理,干预组采用为期3个月的基于健康行动过程取向理论的康复护理。分别在干预前、干预3个月和6个月时应用一般自我效能感量表、改良Barthel日常生活能力指数量表、肩关节疼痛与功能障碍指数对两组患者进行调查。结果:干预3个月、6个月后,干预组患者的一般自我效能感得分分别为(29.01±4.16)分和(36.01±1.96)分,均高于对照组的(26.93±3.30)分和(28.14±4.14)分;干预组患者的日常生活能力得分分别为(79.54±6.60)分和(97.43±1.91)分,均高于对照组的(65.42±9.20)分和(84.52±6.07)分;干预组患者的肩关节疼痛与功能障碍指数总分分别为(39.91±3.58)分和4.00(0,14.00)分,均低于对照组的(70.13±15.98)分和(43.30±10.28)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:基于健康行动过程取向理论的康复护理能够提高心脏起搏器植入术后患者的自我效能,有助于恢复患者日常生活能力。

关键词: 康复护理;健康行动过程取向理论;心脏起搏器植入术;自我效能;肩关节功能

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the effects of rehabilitation nursing based on the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) theoretical model in patients after cardiac pacemaker implantation, in order to improve the rehabilitation efficiency of patients. Methods: A total of 154 patients who underwent pacemaker implantation in a tertiary grade A hospital in Beijing from July 2023 to February 2024 were selected by using convenience sampling method. They were randomly assigned to either a control group (n=77) or an intervention group (n=77) using a random number table. The control group received routine nursing care, while the intervention group received 3-month rehabilitation nursing program based on HAPA theoretical model. The general self-efficacy scale, Modified Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living and Shoulder Pain and Dysfunction Index were used to assess both groups before the intervention, and at 3 months and 6 months post-intervention respectively. Results: After 3 and 6 months of intervention, the intervention group showed significantly higher score (29.01±4.16 and 36.01±1.96) in general self-efficacy compared to the control group (26.93±3.30 and 28.14±4.14). The intervention group also showed significantly higher score (79.54±6.60 and 97.43±1.91) in daily living ability compared to the control group (65.42±9.20 and 84.52±6.07). Additionally, the intervention group had significantly lower scores with 39.91±3.58 and 4.00 (0, 14.00) on the shoulder joint pain and dysfunction index than the control group (70.13±15.98 and 43.30±10.28), the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Rehabilitation nursing based on HAPA theoretical model can enhance self-efficacy, promote living ability in patients after cardiac pacemaker implantation.

Key words: rehabilitation nursing; Health Action Process Approach; cardiac pacemaker implantation; self-efficacy; shoulder joint function

中图分类号:  R47;R197