主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 723-728.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.05.017

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于健康测量工具遴选指南对妇科恶性肿瘤患者性健康评估工具的系统评价

杜易梅 卢吉 刘莉 瞿佳 高杰   

  1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院护理部,430030 武汉市(杜易梅,刘莉,瞿佳);妇科肿瘤(卢吉,高杰);华中科技大学同济医学院护理学院(杜易梅)
  • 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘莉,本科,副主任护师,妇产科总护士长,E-mail:2690583818@qq.com
  • 作者简介:杜易梅,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    2022年华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院基金(2022D05)

Sexual health assessment tools for patients with gynecologic cancer: a COSMIN systematic review

DU Yimei, LU Ji, LIU Li, QU Jia, GAO Jie   

  1. Nursing Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
  • Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-15
  • Contact: E-mail:2690583818@qq.com

摘要: 目的:系统评价妇科恶性肿瘤患者性健康评估工具的方法学质量和测量属性,为医护人员选择评估工具提供依据。方法:检索中英文数据库中关于妇科恶性肿瘤患者性健康评估工具的研究,检索时限为建库至2025年3月16日。依据健康测量工具遴选指南评价纳入的评估工具,形成推荐意见。结果:共纳入20篇文献,包含11种评估工具。其中,宫颈癌生活质量特异性模块、子宫内膜癌生活质量特异性模块、宫颈癌及子宫内膜癌性生活幸福感问卷在内容效度和内部一致性方面符合条件,推荐为A级;有两种评估工具分别因内部一致性和假设检验被评为“不充分”,推荐为C级;其余6种评估工具的内容效度或内部一致性证据支持不足,被评为“不确定”或“不充分”,推荐为B级。结论:宫颈癌生活质量特异性模块和子宫内膜癌生活质量特异性模块侧重于评估生活质量;宫颈癌及子宫内膜癌性生活幸福感问卷可综合评估性健康,但能否在国内广泛应用,仍需要进一步验证。

关键词: 妇科恶性肿瘤;性健康;评估工具;测量属性;健康测量工具遴选指南;系统评价

Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the methodological quality and measurement properties of sexual health assessment tools for patients with gynecologic cancer, providing a basis for selecting appropriate tools for healthcare professionals. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases up to March 16, 2025. Tools were evaluated using the COSMIN criteria to form recommendations. Results: Twenty studies were included, covering 11 sexual health assessment tools. The Quality of Life Questionnaire Cervical Cancer Module, Quality of Life Questionnaire Endometrial Cancer Module, and Sexual Well-being after Cervical or Endometrial cancer met the criteria for content validity and internal consistency, receiving grade A recommendations. Two tools were rated as grade C due to insufficient internal consistency or hypothesis testing. The remaining six tools were rated as grade B due to limited evidence for content validity or internal consistency. Conclusion: The Quality of Life Questionnaire Cervical Cancer Module and the Quality of Life Questionnaire Endometrial Cancer Module focus on assessing quality of life, while the Sexual Well-being after Cervical or Endometrial cancer comprehensively evaluates sexual health. However, its applicability in China requires further validation.

Key words: gynecologic cancer; sexual health; assessment tools; measurement properties; COSMIN Guidelines; systematic review

中图分类号:  R47;R197