主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 730-736.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.05.019

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

癌症患者家庭照护者需求评估工具的系统综述

杨盼盼 范燕燕 马梦真 管庆艺 杜星斌   

  1. 滨州医学院护理学院,264003山东省烟台市
  • 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 范燕燕,博士,硕士生导师,副教授,副院长,E-mail:y51617@126.com
  • 作者简介:杨盼盼,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    2018年山东省研究生导师指导能力提升项目(SDYY18171)

A systematic review of the evaluation themes of the needs assessment tools for family caregivers of patients with cancer

YANG Panpan, FAN Yanyan, MA Mengzhen, GUAN Qingyi, DU Xingbin   

  1. School of Nursing, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong province, 264003, China
  • Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-05-15
  • Contact: E-mail:y51617@126.com

摘要: 目的:系统综述癌症患者家庭照护者需求评估工具。方法:计算机检索中国知网、中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、Embase以及Cochrane Library?9个数据库,筛选癌症患者家庭照护者需求评估工具的原始研究,采用量表性能评价标准对纳入的需求评估工具进行测量学性能评价,结合维度内容提取需求评估主题,基于马斯洛需求层次理论进行主题聚类。结果:共纳入14个需求评估工具,需求评估工具的内容效度、内部一致性和结构效度评价为“好”者占比分别为43%、21%和14%。提取27个需求评估主题,聚类为6个需求层次,其中自我实现需求、爱与归属需求和认知需求涉及的主题较多,尊重需求和安全需求涉及的主题较少,缺少审美需求层次主题。结论:需求评估工具的内容较为丰富,但应进一步拓展,并且其心理测量学性能整体水平有待提高。

关键词: 需求评估工具;家庭照护者;照护者需求;系统综述;癌症

Abstract: Objective: To systematically review the needs assessment tools for family caregivers of patients with cancer. Methods: We searched 9 databases. Original studies of the needs assessment tools for family caregivers of patients with cancer were screened. Included tools were appraised using the quality criteria for judging the psychometric properties. And needs themes were extracted based on the original tools' dimension contents. All of the needs themes were clustered based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory. Results: We collected 14 needs assessment tools, extracted 27 needs themes and clustered in 6 needs levels. Among them, the most widely involved needs were self-actualization needs, love and belonging needs and cognitive needs. Esteem needs and safty needs were less tested, while aesthetic needs were omitted. The content validity, internal consistency and construct validity of the assessment tools were appraised as "good" accounted for 43%, 21% and 14% respectively. Conclusion: The content of the needs assessment tool is relatively rich, but it should be further expanded, and the overall level of its psychometric properties needs to be improved further.

Key words: needs assessment tool; family caregiver; caregiver need; systematic review; cancer

中图分类号:  R47;R197