主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 243-248.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.02.018

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

慢性心力衰竭管理临床实践指南的质量评价与内容分析

崔玲玲 胡慧秀 孙超   

  1. 北京医院心内科 国家老年医学中心 中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,100730 北京市(崔玲玲);护理部(胡慧秀,孙超)
  • 出版日期:2021-02-15 发布日期:2021-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙超,硕士,副主任护师,护理部副主任,E-mail:sunchaobjyy@163.com
  • 作者简介:崔玲玲,本科,主管护师,护士长
  • 基金资助:
    2020年度北京医院临床研究“121 工程”项目(BJ-2019-194);北京医院 “科技新星”项目(BJ-2020-089);北京医院院级科研课题(BJ-2019-166);复旦循证护理中心证据转化与临床应用项目(Fudanebn2019020)

Quality evaluation and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines for the management of Chronic Heart Failure

CUI Lingling, HU Huixiu, SUN Chao   

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing Hospital, 100730, China
  • Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-15
  • Contact: E-mail:sunchaobjyy@163.com

摘要: 目的:对国内外已发表的慢性心力衰竭管理临床实践指南进行质量评价和内容分析,为我国慢性心力衰竭的管理与护理临床实践提供参考与借鉴。方法:计算机检索美国卫生保健政策研究所、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所、安大略注册护士协会、苏格兰院际间指南网、美国心脏协会、美国心力衰竭协会、美国心脏病学会、加拿大心血管学会、欧洲心脏病学会、澳大利亚乔安娜布里格斯研究所循证卫生保健中心数据库、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台和中国生物医学文献数据库中涉及慢性心力衰竭管理的相关指南。应用临床指南研究与评价工具对纳入的指南进行质量评价,并汇总各指南的推荐内容进行整理分析。结果:共纳入9篇临床实践指南,其中3篇为A级推荐、3篇为B级推荐、3篇为C级推荐。指南的推荐意见较为一致,但仍存在一定的差异。结论:纳入的慢性心力衰竭管理的临床实践指南质量整体较好。其推荐意见可为进一步规范临床患者管理,降低住院率及病死率提供依据。同时,应考虑具体国情,在借鉴国外高质量指南的基础上根据我国国情进行本土化循证指南的制定和更新,以指导临床实践。

关键词: 慢性心力衰竭;实践指南;质量评价;内容分析法;循证护理

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the quality and analyze the contents of the published clinical practice guidelines for the management of Chronic Heart Failure at home and abroad, so as to provide reference for the clinical practice of the management and nursing of Chronic Heart Failure in China. Methods: Guidelines on the management of Chronic Heart Failure were retrieved from the following sources: the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, the American Heart Association, the Heart Failure Society of America, the American College of Cardiology, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, European Society of Cardiology, Joanna Briggs Institute, Evidence-based Health Care Center Database, Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, WANGFANG DATA, and CBM. Clinical guidelines research and evaluation tools were used to evaluate the quality of the included guidelines. The recommendations of the included guidelines were collated and analyzed. Results: A total of 9 clinical practice guidelines were included, of which 3 were grade A recommendations, 3 were grade B recommendations and 3 were grade C recommendations. The recommendations of the guidelines were consistent but there were still some differences. Conclusion: The overall quality of the included clinical practice guidelines for the management of Chronic Heart Failure is good. Their recommendations can provide a basis for further standardizing the management of clinical patients and reducing hospitalization and mortality. However, the specific national conditions should be considered. The development and update of localized evidence-based guidelines should be carried out based on the national conditions of China and by learning from foreign high-quality guidelines, so as to guide clinical practice.

Key words: Chronic Heart Failure; practice guideline; quality evaluation; content analysis; evidence-based nursing

中图分类号: 

  • R47