主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 186-190.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.02.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床领导力量表的汉化及信度效度检验

李全 万巧琴 杨悦   

  1. 北京大学护理学院,100191(李全,万巧琴);北京大学口腔医院口腔颌面外科(杨悦)
  • 出版日期:2021-02-15 发布日期:2021-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 万巧琴,博士,副教授,E-mail:qqwan05@163.com;杨悦,硕士,主任护师,E-mail:yangyuekq@163.com
  • 作者简介:李全,硕士,护师

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Clinical Leadership Survey

LI Quan, WAN Qiaoqin, YANG Yue   

  1. Nursing School of Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
  • Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-15
  • Contact: E-mail:qqwan05@163.com;E-mail:yangyuekq@163.com

摘要: 目的:对临床领导力量表(Clinical Leadership Survey,CLS)进行翻译与跨文化调试,检验中文版CLS的信度和效度,为我国临床护士领导力研究提供有效工具。方法:通过直译-回译法将CLS翻译为中文,通过专家咨询法和对40名临床护士的预调查进行跨文化调试;便利抽取315名临床护士进行正式调查,4名专家进行内容效度评价,以检验中文版CLS的信度和效度。结果:中文版CLS由5个维度,15个条目构成。项目分析结果显示,条目临界比CR值均>3.0,条目与量表总分相关系数为0.680~0.829(P<0.01);验证性因子分析显示,χ2/df=2.413,RMSEA=0.079,TLI=0.917,CFI=0.941;内容效度评价结果显示,条目水平的内容效度指数与量表总体内容效度指数均为1;信度分析结果显示,量表总体Cronbach’s?α系数为0.942,各维度Cronbach’s?α系数为0.748~0.889,重测信度为0.892(P<0.001)。结论:中文版CLS信度和效度良好,可作为评价我国临床护士领导力的有效工具。

关键词: 临床领导力;护士;临床护士领导力;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To conduct translation and cross-cultural modification of the Clinical Leadership Survey (CLS), to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Methods: The Chinese version of CLS was developed through the process of translation and back-translation, conduct cross-cultural modification through expert consultation and pilot-test. Totally 315 clinical nurses were investigated through convenience sampling for test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of CLS. Four experts conducted content validity evaluation. Results: The Chinese version of CLS consisted of 5 factors and 15 items. The items analysis indicated that the CR was more than 3.0 and correlation coefficients between the items and the total score were 0.680-0.829 (P<0.01). The confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=2.413, RMSEA=0.079, TLI=0.917 and CFI=0.941. The content validity results were confirmed with I-CVIs and S-CVI of 1. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the overall scale was 0.942, and ranging from 0.748-0.889 for each factor. The test-retest reliability was 0.892 (P<0.001). Conclusion: The Chinese version of CLS has proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used as a valid tool to evaluate the leadership of clinical nurses in China.

Key words: clinical leadership; nurse; staff nurse clinical leadership; reliability; validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47