主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 524-528.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.04.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

伦理决策信心量表的汉化及其在护理管理者中的信度效度检验

孙一诺 李丽 颜艳 刘晨伟 孙相洁 翟永华   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院第一手术室,250012 济南市(孙一诺,李丽,刘晨伟,翟永华);护理部(颜艳);骨外科(孙相洁)
  • 出版日期:2025-04-15 发布日期:2025-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 翟永华,硕士,主任护师,科护士长,E-mail:zhaiyonghua@163.com
  • 作者简介:孙一诺,硕士,护师

Translation of the Ethical Decision-Making Confidence scale and assessment of its reliability and validity among nurse managers

SUN Yinuo, LI Li, YAN Yan, LIU Chenwei, SUN Xiangjie, ZHAI Yonghua   

  1. The First Operating Room, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
  • Online:2025-04-15 Published:2025-04-15
  • Contact: E-mail:zhaiyonghua@163.com

摘要: 目的:汉化伦理决策信心量表(Ethical Decision-Making Confidence scale,EDMC)并检验其信度、效度,为我国护理管理者伦理决策信心相关研究提供有效测评工具。方法:遵循Brislin回译模型对源量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适及预调查,形成中文版EDMC;采用便利抽样法,于2023年9月至2024年1月对济南市8家综合医院的433名护士长进行调查,检验量表的信度、效度。结果:中文版EDMC包括2个维度,共16个条目,累计方差贡献率为66.310%;验证性因子分析结果显示模型拟合度良好,χ2/df=1.319、RMSEA=0.038、GFI=0.931、AGFI=0.909、NFI=0.943。量表条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.975,量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为0.969;量表与心理授权量表得分的相关系数为0.752;量表总的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.933,技能信心、行为信心维度的Cronbach’s?α系数分别为0.937、0.902,Spearman-Brown折半信度系数为0.906,量表总的重测信度为0.881,技能信心、行为信心维度的重测信度分别为0.836、0.885。结论:中文版EDMC具有良好的信度和效度,可作为护理管理者伦理决策信心的评估工具。

关键词: 伦理决策;护理管理者;量表;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To translate the Ethical Decision-Making Confidence scale (EDMC) into Chinese and examine its reliability and validity, so as to provide an effective assessment tool for research on the ethical decision-making confidence of nurse managers in China. Methods: Following Brislin's model, the original scale was translated, back-translated, culturally adapted and pre-investigated to form the Chinese version of the EDMC scale. Using the convenience sampling method, a total of 433 head nurses from 8 general hospitals in Jinan were surveyed from September 2023 to January 2024 to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: The Chinese version of the EDMC scale consisted of 2 dimensions and encompassed a total of 16 items, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 66.310%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=1.319, RMSEA=0.038, GFI=0.931, AGFI=0.909, NFI=0.943, indicating a good model fit. The item-level CVI of the EDMC was 0.975, and the scale-level CVI was 0.969. The correlation coefficient between the EDMC scale and the psychological empowerment scale was 0.752. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.933, while the Cronbach's α coefficients of the confidence in skill and behavior dimensions were 0.937 and 0.902 respectively. The Spearman-Brown broken half reliability coefficient was 0.906. The retest reliability of the scale was 0.881, and the retest reliabilities of the confidence in skill and behavior dimensions were 0.836 and 0.885, respectively. Conclusion: The Chinese version of EDMC has good reliability and validity and can be used as an assessment tool for the ethical decision-making confidence of nurse managers.

Key words: ethical decision-making; nurse manager; scale; reliability; validity

中图分类号:  R47;R197