主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 852-857.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.06.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理质量现场督查发现问题模式研究

张晓红 张亚男 边美蓉 岳忠娟 张翠玲   

  1. 山西白求恩医院护理部,030032 太原市(张晓红,边美蓉);急诊科(张亚男);骨科(岳忠娟);消化系统肿瘤科(张翠玲)
  • 出版日期:2025-06-15 发布日期:2025-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 张翠玲,本科,副主任护师,专科护士长,E-mail:sxbqezcl@163.com
  • 作者简介:张晓红,硕士,主任护师,护理部副主任

The model of problems identification in the on-site supervision of nursing quality

ZHANG Xiaohong, ZHANG Yanan, BIAN Meirong, YUE Zhongjuan, ZHANG Cuiling   

  1. Nursing Department, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, China
  • Online:2025-06-15 Published:2025-06-15
  • Contact: E-mail:sxbqezcl@163.com

摘要: 目的:梳理护理管理者在护理质量现场督查中发现问题的思路及方式,为科学合理地开展临床护理质量督查提供参考。方法:采用文献分析、半结构式访谈、问卷调查凝练出护理质量现场督查发现问题的视角及方式;采用专题小组讨论法形成护理质量现场督查发现问题模式条目池;采用德尔菲法在全国范围内选取35名专家进行两轮函询,形成护理质量现场督查发现问题模式;2024年7月初步应用该模式,比较模式应用前后护士长在跨科室进行质量督查时发现问题的自我效能感的差异。结果:两轮专家函询问卷有效回收率分别为88.6%、93.5%;专家权威程度系数分别为0.88、0.92;肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.20、0.26(均P<0.05);明确了护理质量现场督查发现问题的3种视角,分别是直接获取、比较发现、深层挖掘;明确了发现问题的6种方式,分别是听、看、问、查、访、追;明确了每种视角的应用契机及6种方式的具体内容。模式应用后护士长在跨科室进行质量督查时,发现问题的自我效能感比应用前有明显提升(P<0.001)。结论:护理质量现场督查发现问题模式形成科学、可靠,可作为科学合理地开展护理质量督查的指引。

关键词: 护理质量;现场督查;发现问题;德尔菲

Abstract: Objective: To sort out the ways of nursing managers in identifying problems in the on-site supervision of nursing quality, so as to provide reference for scientific and reasonable clinical nursing quality supervision. Methods: Literature analysis, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires were used to summarize the perspectives and ways of problems identification in the on-site supervision of nursing quality. Focus group discussions were used to form an item pool regarding the models of problems identification in nursing quality on-site supervision. The Delphi method was used and 35 experts were invited for two rounds consultation to finalized the model of problems identification in nursing quality on-site supervision. The finalized model of problems identification was preliminarily applied in practice in July 2024, and the difference in the self-efficacy of head nurses during cross-departmental quality supervision before and after the application of the model was compared. Results: The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultations were 88.6% and 93.5%, respectively. The coefficients of the degree of authority were 0.88 and 0.92, respectively. The coefficients of Kendall's concordance were 0.20 and 0.26, respectively (both P<0.05). The three perspectives of problem identification in nursing quality on-site supervision were clarified as direct acquisition, comparative discovery, and in-depth exploration. Six ways of problem identification were listening, looking, asking, checking, visiting, and tracking. The timing of applying each perspective and the specific contents of the six ways of problem identification were clarified. After the application of the model, the self-efficacy of the head nurses in problems identification was significantly higher than that before the application (P<0.001). Conclusion: The model of problems identification in on-site supervision of nursing quality is scientifically developed, reliable, and can be used as a guideline for scientific and reasonable nursing quality supervision.

Key words: nursing quality; on-site supervision; problem identification; Delphi method

中图分类号:  R47;R197