主管：国家卫生健康委员会
主办：国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊（中国科技论文统计源期刊）
中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 898-903.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.06.019

• 人力资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

反思性实践问卷的汉化与修订及其在专科护士中的信度效度检验

吴雪 李燕 李静 庞建美 王秋静   

  1. 天津中医药大学研究生院，301617 天津市（吴雪）；天津医科大学肿瘤医院高级病房国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心（李燕，李静，庞建美，王秋静）
  • 出版日期:2022-06-15 发布日期:2022-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 李燕，本科，主任护师，护士长，E-mail:liyan1@tjmuch.com
  • 作者简介:吴雪，硕士在读

Reliability and validity of Reflective Practice Questionnaire of Chinese version and its application in Specialist Nurses

WU Xue, LI Yan, LI Jing, PANG Jianmei, WANG Qiujing   

  1. Graduate School of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China
  • Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-06-30
  • Contact: E-mail:liyan1@tjmuch.com

PDF (PC)

139

赞

摘要： 目的：翻译并修订反思性实践问卷（Reflective Practice Questionnaire，RPQ），检验中文版RPQ的信度和效度，为我国专科护士反思性实践研究提供测评工具。方法：采用改良版Brislin翻译模式，通过专家咨询及预调查进行跨文化调适；采用便利抽样法，选取天津市8所三级甲等医院的720名专科护士进行问卷调查，7名专家进行内容效度评价，检验量表信度和效度。结果：中文版RPQ由5个因子，33个条目组成。效度分析结果：探索性因子共提取5个公因子，累积方差贡献率63.856%；内容效度结果：I-CVI为0.86～1.00，S- CVI为0.98；信度分析结果：总量表的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.950，各因子的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.750～ 0.949，折半信度为0.927，各因子的折半信度为0.607～0.921，重测信度为0.957。结论：中文版RPQ的信度和效度良好，可作为评价我国专科护士反思性实践的有效工具。

关键词: 专科护士；反思性实践；信度；效度

Abstract: Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire (RPQ), so as to provide an assessment tool for the Reflective Practice study of nurses in our country. Methods: The improved Brislin translation model was used to localize the scale, and cross-cultural adjustment was carried out through expert consultation and pre-survey. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 720 nurse specialists from 8 tertiary grade A hospitals in Tianjin, and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested by 7 experts. Results: The Chinese RPQ scale consists of 5 factors and 33 items. The results of validity analysis showed that 5 common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution was 63.856%. The results of content validity showed that I-CVI was 0.86-1.00, S-CVI was 0.99, the overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.950, the Cronbach's α coefficient of each dimension was 0.750-0.949, the split-half reliability was 0.927, the split-half reliability of each dimension was 0.607-0.921, and the retest reliability was 0.957. Conclusion: The Chinese version of RPQ has good reliability and validity, and can be used as an effective tool to measure the reflective practice of nurses in our country.

Key words: Specialist Nurse; reflective practice; reliability; validity

中图分类号:  R47,R197
版权所有 © 《中国护理管理》杂志社   京公网安备 11010202005821号   京ICP备11024163号


本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发