主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10): 1496-1500.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.10.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

简化版患者感知安宁疗护质量量表的汉化及信度效度检验

张艳慧 魏万宏 胡艳丽 姚颖   

  1. 郑州大学护理与健康学院,450001郑州市(张艳慧, 魏万宏,姚颖);暨南大学护理学院(胡艳丽)
  • 出版日期:2021-10-15 发布日期:2021-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 魏万宏,硕士,教授,E-mail:zdwww@zzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张艳慧,硕士在读

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the short form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective for Palliative Care

ZHANG Yanhui, WEI Wanhong, HU Yanli, YAO Ying   

  1. Nursing and Health School, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China
  • Online:2021-10-15 Published:2021-10-15
  • Contact: E-mail:zdwww@zzu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的:汉化简化版患者感知安宁疗护质量量表(short form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient’s Perspective for Palliative Care,QPP-PC),并对其进行信度和效度检验。方法:采用Brislin翻译模型对量表进行翻译、回译和文化调适,形成中文简化版QPP-PC。采用便利抽样法对河南省两所安宁疗护试点医院及某医院安宁疗护病房的420名患者进行问卷调查,评价量表的信度和效度。结果:中文简化版QPP-PC包含医疗技术能力(2个条目)、物理技术条件(3个条目)、个体化护理方式(9个条目)、社会文化氛围(6个条目)4个维度,以及5个单项条目。对每一条目均需从主观重要性和对护理的实际感知两个角度来回答,主观重要性分量表的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.918,重测信度为0.901,折半信度为0.751;实际感知分量表的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.900,重测信度为0.887,折半信度为0.779。结论:修订后中文简化版QPP-PC在中国文化背景下具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估安宁疗护质量的工具。

关键词: 安宁疗护;护理质量;量表汉化;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To translate and verify the validity and reliability of the short form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient’s Perspective for Palliative Care (QPP-PC). Methods: Standard forward-back translation techniques, including translation, back translation and cross-cultural adaptation, were used in the translation of the QPP-PC according to the Brislin translation model. Reliability and validity were tested with QPP-PC data collected from 420 subjects in two pilot hospice care hospitals and one hospice care ward in Henan Province by convenience sampling. Results: The Chinese version of QPP-PC included 4 dimensions: Medical-technical competence (2 items), Physical-technical conditions (3 items), Identity-oriented approach (9 items), Sociocultural atmosphere (6 items) and 5 single items. Each item needs to be answered in terms of both Subjective Importance (SI) and Perceived reality (PR). The Cronbach’s α coefficient of SI subscale is 0.918, the retest reliability is 0.901, and the half reliability is 0.751. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of PR subscale is 0.900, the retest reliability is 0.887, and the half-fold reliability is 0.779. Conclusion: The Chinese version QPP-PC shows high validity and reliability to be used in assessing the quality of palliative care.

Key words: palliative care; nursing quality; scale translation; reliability; validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47