主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (8): 1169-1174.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.08.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

孕期体质量管理保护动机问卷的编制及信度效度检验

程梦云 周昔红 侯宜萍 申玥涵 周冰 谭汀娜   

  1. 中南大学湘雅二医院临床学护理教研室,410011长沙市(程梦云,周昔红,侯宜萍,周冰,谭汀娜);常德职业技术学院,415000 湖南省(程梦云);湖南师范大学(申玥涵)
  • 出版日期:2021-08-15 发布日期:2021-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 周昔红,硕士,主任护师,临床护理学教研室副主任,硕士生导师,E-mail:zhouxihong@csu.edu.cn E-mail:E-mail:a19950529@qq.com
  • 作者简介:程梦云,硕士,护师,E-mail:a19950529@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金(2019JJ80049)

Development and psychometric evaluation of protective motivation for weight management during pregnancy questionnaire

CHENG Mengyun, ZHOU Xihong, HOU Yiping, SHEN Yuehan, ZHOU Bing, TAN Tingna   

  1. Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China; Changde Vocational Technical College, Hunan province, 415000, China
  • Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-15
  • Contact: E-mail:zhouxihong@csu.edu.cn E-mail:E-mail:a19950529@qq.com

摘要: 目的:编制孕期体质量管理保护动机问卷,进行信度、效度检验。方法:以保护动机理论为理论基础,通过文献分析法、半结构式访谈和德尔菲专家函询形成初始问卷,采用目的抽样法对381名孕妇进行调查,通过项目分析法、内容效度、结构效度、内部一致性信度、组合信度、重测信度对问卷进行评价。结果:最终形成的孕期体质量管理保护动机问卷包含6个维度,32个条目;探索性因子分析提取出7个公因子,保留6个公因子,解释方差贡献度的63.236%;验证性因子分析显示χ2/df=1.331,RMSEA=0.047,CFI=0.942,IFI=0.927,TLI=0.917;问卷的内容效度指数S-CVI/UA=1.00,S-CVI/AVE=0.92,各条目的内容效度指数为0.83~1.00;问卷整体Cronbach’s?α系数为0.894,各维度的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.652~0.920。问卷整体的重测信度为0.947,各维度的重测信度为0.846~0.956;各维度的组合信度系数在0.563~0.915,平方方差抽取量均在0.305~0.624。结论:孕期体质量管理保护动机问卷信度、效度较好,可作为评价我国孕期妇女体质量管理保护动机水平的工具,能在一定程度上预测孕妇在孕期采取体质量管理健康行为可能性的大小,为临床孕期体质量管理方案的制定与评价提供依据和参考。

关键词: 孕期妇女;体质量管理;保护动机;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To develop a questionnaire about the pregnancy weight management and protective motivation, and test its psychometric properties. Methods: Based on the protective motivation theory, an initial questionnaire was formed through literature analysis, semi-structured interviews and Delphi expert correspondence. Purposive sampling method was used to investigate 381 pregnant women, and the questionnaire was evaluated by item analysis method, content validity, structure validity, internal consistency reliability, combination reliability, and test-retest reliability. Results: The final pregnancy weight management and protective motivation contained six dimensions and thirty-two items; explorative factor analysis extracted seven common factors and retained six common factors, explaining 63.236% of variance contribution. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=1.331, RMSEA=0.047, CFI=0.942, IFI=0.927, TLI=0.917. The content of the questionnaire validity index was S-CVI/UA=1.00, S-CVI/AVE=0.92, and the I-CVI of each item was 0.83 to 1.00, and the overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.894. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of each dimension was 0.652 to 0.920 respectively. The overall test-retest reliability of the questionnaire was 0.947, and the test-retest reliability of each dimension was 0.846 to 0.956. The combined reliability coefficient of each dimension was 0.563 to 0.915, respectively, and the squared variance extraction was 0.305 to 0.624. Conclusion: The pregnancy weight management and protective motivation questionnaire has good reliability and validity, so it can be used to evaluate the level of protective motivation for weight management in pregnant women in China, and it can predict the likelihood of pregnant women adopting weight management health behaviors to a certain extent. It provides basis and reference for the formulation and evaluation of weight management plan.

Key words: pregnant women; weight management; protection motivation; reliability; validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47