主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 38-43.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.01.009

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

预后和治疗认知问卷的修订及信度效度检验

尹霄朦 姜园园 汤优优 张业玲 赵亚玲 刘庆伟 朱秀丽   

  1. 青岛大学护理学院,山东省 266000(尹霄朦,姜园园,赵亚玲,刘庆伟,朱秀丽);青岛大学附属医院肿瘤综合治疗科(汤优优);肿瘤放疗科(张业玲)
  • 出版日期:2020-01-15 发布日期:2020-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 朱秀丽,硕士,副教授,E-mail:15820022927@163.com
  • 作者简介:尹霄朦,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    2017年山东省研究生导师指导能力提升计划项目(SDYY17181)

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire

YIN Xiaomeng, JIANG Yuanyuan, TANG Youyou, ZHANG Yeling, ZHAO Yaling, LIU Qingwei, ZHU Xiuli   

  1. School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, China
  • Online:2020-01-15 Published:2020-01-15
  • Contact: E-mail:15820022927@163.com

摘要: 目的:翻译并修订预后和治疗认知问卷,并对其进行信度和效度检验。方法:采用Brislin翻译模型对英文版预后和治疗认知问卷进行翻译、回译、文化调试及修订,最终形成中文版预后和治疗认知问卷,并将问卷应用于198例晚期癌症患者,评价问卷的信度和效度。结果:中文版预后和治疗认知问卷包括两部分,共17个条目。通过探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为82.513%;问卷各条目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.80~1.00,全部条目的平均内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为0.91;问卷总的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.845,各因子的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.688~0.956;Guttman折半信度系数为0.867。结论:中文版预后和治疗认知问卷具有良好的信度和效度,我国临床医护人员可用其评估晚期癌症患者预后和治疗认知水平。

关键词: 预后和治疗认知问卷;晚期癌症患者;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To translate and revise the Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire (PTPQ), and test its reliability and validity. Methods: The English version of PTPQ was translated, back-translated, cultural modified and revised based on Brislin translation model. The Chinese version of PTPQ was then applied to 198 patients with advanced cancer to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results: The Chinese version of the PTPQ consisted of two parts, with a total of 17 items. Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 82.513%. The content validity index of each item (I-CVI) in the questionnaire was 0.80-1.00, and the average content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.91. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.845, the Cronbach's α of each factor was 0.688-0.956, and the Guttman's half-fold reliability coefficient was 0.867. Conclusion: The Chinese version of PTPQ has good reliability and validity, and it can effectively evaluate the prognosis and treatment cognition of advanced cancer patients for clinical medical staff in China.

Key words: Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire; advanced cancer patients; reliability; validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47