主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 824-829.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.06.006

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

徒手淋巴引流对乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿预防及治疗效果的Meta分析

杨璇 张海林 刘玉 吴风雷   

  1. 南京医科大学连云港临床医学院,222000 江苏省连云港市(杨璇,张海林,吴风雷);南京医科大学康达学院护理学系(刘玉)
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15 发布日期:2019-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 张海林,硕士,主任护师,教授,副院长,E-mail:luckhailin@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨璇,硕士,主管护师
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81401968)

Meta analysis of Manual Lymphatic Drainage on prevention and treatment of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema

YANG Xuan, ZHANG Hailin, LIU Yu, WU Fenglei   

  1. Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, 222000, China
  • Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-06-15
  • Contact: E-mail:luckhailin@163.com

摘要: 目的:系统评价徒手淋巴引流(Manual Lymph Drainage,MLD)预防和治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema,BCRL)的效果,为合理制定BCRL预防和治疗方案提供证据。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、The Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库(CMB)、中国知网(CNKI),全面收集MLD预防和治疗BCRL的随机对照试验(RCT),检索年限为建库至2018年3月;由2名评价者按照研究的纳入、排除标准筛选文献并独立评价文献质量,采用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入9个RCT,1?112例患者;Meta分析结果显示,MLD预防BCRL发生的效果与其他措施相比差异有统计学意义[OR=0.31,95%CI(0.12,0.83),Z=2.33,P=0.02];MLD治疗BCRL的效果与其他措施相比差异无统计学意义[SMD=0.17,95%CI(-0.08,0.41),Z=1.34,P=0.18][WMD=-0.21,95%CI(-1.54,1.12),Z=0.31,P=0.76];MLD预防BCRL发生的结局指标证据强度为中级,MLD治疗BCRL的2个结局指标的证据强度分别为中级、低级。结论:现有证据表明与其他护理方法相比,MLD可以有效预防BCRL的发生,但不能有效治疗BCRL患者患肢肿胀,对患肢的疼痛缓解效果也不佳;临床护理人员应在乳腺癌术后早期指导患者进行MLD,应用综合护理措施管理乳腺癌术后患者,以改善其健康结局,提高其生活质量。

关键词: 徒手淋巴引流;乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿;Meta分析

Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the effect of Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) on the prevention and treatment of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema (BCRL), and provide high-quality evidence for the rational development of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema prevention and treatment programs. Methods: The data were retrieved of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effect of MLD on prevention and treatment of BCRL from PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CMB and CNKI databases from inception to Mar,2018. Two independent evaluators screened and evaluated the quality of the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. RevMan5.3 software was used for Meta analysis. Results: A total of 9 RCT studies involving 1 112 patients were included.Meta analysis results showed that the effect of MLD on BCRL prevention was statistically significant compared with other measures [OR=0.31, 95%CI (0.12,0.83), Z=2.33, P=0.02]. The effect of MLD on treatment of BCRL was not statistically significant compared with other measures [SMD=0.17, 95%CI (-0.08,0.41), Z=1.34, P=0.18] [WMD=-0.21, 95%CI (-1.54,1.12), Z=0.31, P=0.76]. The evidence intensity of prevention of BCRL by MLD was moderate. The strengths of two evidences for MLD treatment of BCRL were moderate and low, respectively. Conclusion: Existing evidence shows that compared with other nursing methods, MLD can effectively prevent the occurrence of BCRL, but cannot effectively treat the swelling degree of BCRL patients' limb, and the pain relief effect on the affected limb is not good. Clinical nurses should guide the patients to carry out MLD at the early stage after breast cancer surgery, and manage the patients after surgery using comprehensive nursing measures, so as to improve their health outcomes and improve their quality of life.

Key words: Manual Lymph Drainage; Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema; Meta analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R47