主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

• 肿瘤护理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用PUSH评分实施压疮管理的实践

宋瑰琦 秦玉荣 刘曼曼 程圣莉 秦寒枝   

  1. 安徽省立医院护理部(宋瑰琦,刘曼曼);重症医学科(秦玉荣);内镜中心(程圣莉)
  • 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2016-07-25

A study to evaluate the role of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing in Pressure Ulcer treatment

  • Online:2016-07-25 Published:2016-07-25

摘要: 目的:介绍PUSH 评分在压疮过程管理中的应用方法。方法:2015 年7 月至2016 年4 月期间,在我院住院的455 例(567 处)II-IV 期压疮患者,均采用PUSH 量表评价压疮的动态变化(首次评价、常规每周一次、末次评价,若有换药或伤口变化时则随时评价)并记录,观察各期压疮首次和末次PUSH 分值的变化以及患者的转归。结果:压疮首次PUSH 评分是(8.37±3.14) 分,末次评分是(7.22±3.99) 分,两者之间有统计学差异(P <0.01);其中II、III 期压疮及院外带入压疮治疗护理前后首次、末次PUSH 评分有统计学差异(P <0.01),而IV 期压疮和院内发生压疮治疗前后首末次PUSH 评分无统计学差异(P >0.05)。结论:我院压疮护理总体有效;PUSH评分工具简便可行,能较为客观和量化地评价压疮愈合过程,体现压疮管理效果。

Abstract: Objective: To determine the effect of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) on evaluating pressure ulcer treatment. Methods: 455 patients (567 sites) with II-IV grade pressure ulcers were recruited in the study. The pressure ulcers were examined weekly, and the data collection tool was the PUSH. Results Significant differences were found before(8.37±3.14) and after (7.22±3.99) pressure ulcer treatment (P<0.01), except for IV stage pressure ulcer and non-hospital acquired ulcer (P>0.05). Conclusion:Pressure ulcer care overall effective in our hospital. Considering its easy availability, the PUSH can be used to track the healing progress of pressure ulcers.