主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

• 护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理学基础课程模块化改革及应用

钱春荣 程红缨 杨燕妮   

  1. 第三军医大学护理学院基础护理学教研室
  • 出版日期:2015-07-25 发布日期:2015-07-25
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目(1203113)

Reforming and application of modular curriculum in fundamental nursing science

  • Online:2015-07-25 Published:2015-07-25

摘要: 目的:评价护理学基础课程模块化的应用效果。方法:2012 级38 名护理本科生为试验组,按照改革后的护理学基础一门课程5 个模块进行教学,5 个模块分别是模块Ⅰ- 感性认识护理、模块Ⅱ - 护理学基本理论、模块Ⅲ - 一般性护理知识、模块Ⅳ - 治疗性护理知识、模块Ⅴ - 护理技能综合培训。2010 级49 名护理本科生作为对照组,按照改革前的专业思想教育——了解临床、护理学导论、基础护理学、集中见习与岗前培训4 门独立课程进行教学。结果:实施护理学基础课程模块化改革后,2012 级护生结课时的平均成绩为(86.50±5.02) 分、优良率占49.4%、课程总体满意度评分为(98.40±0.71) 分,平均成绩、优良率与改革前实施传统课程设置的2010 级护生比较无统计学差异(P >0.05),但是课程满意度高于改革前对照组(P <0.01)。结论:护理学基础课程模块化改革通过对教学内容的重组实现减课程(4 门减至1 门)及减课时(总学时由290 学时调整至260学时)的目标,应用后保持了较好的学习效果,且得到学生高满意度反馈。

Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect of the modular curriculum in fundamental nursing science. Methods: Grade 2012 nursing undergraduate students (n=38), as experimental group, performed the reformed curriculum setting of one curriculum with 5 modules in fundamental nursing science for teaching. Grade 2010 nursing students (n=49), as control group, performed the prereformed curriculum setting of four independent courses for teaching. Results: The final scores and the excellent and good rates had no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group (P>0.05). But the satisfaction score with the curriculum in the experimental group was higher than the control group (P<0.01). Conclusion: The modular curriculum reform in basic nursing science maintained the high learning effects, and received the high satisfaction feedback from students.