主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 64-68.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.01.013

• 重症护理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

14家三级甲等医院ICU护士压力性损伤知识现况与影响因素分析

蒋琪霞 祝文君 倪娟 李丽 王亚玲 宋彩萍 王静 郑喜灿 罗丽琴 唐永利 嵇会明 蒋炜 李丽   

  1. 解放军东部战区总医院烧伤整形科,210002 南京市(蒋琪霞);护理部(倪娟); 云南省红河州第一人民医院伤口造口治疗中心(祝文君);郑州大学附属信阳医院普通外科(李丽);解放军陆军特色医学中心护理部(王亚玲);陆军军医大学第二附属医院老年与特勤医学科(宋彩萍);同济大学附属杨浦医院护理部(王静);解放军联勤保障部队第988医院护理部(郑喜灿);解放军联勤保障部队923医院门诊部(罗丽琴);重庆医科大学第一附属医院骨科(唐永利);解放军联勤保障部队第904医院门诊部(嵇会明);空军军医大学第二附属医院护理处(蒋炜);海军军医大学附属第三医院护理处(李丽)
  • 出版日期:2025-01-15 发布日期:2025-01-15
  • 作者简介:蒋琪霞,硕士,主任护师,护士长,E-mail:jiangqixia1963@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    军队保健专项课题(21BJZ38);军队卫勤保障创新能力生成专项课题(20WQ027)

Current situation and influencing factors of Pressure Injury knowledge among ICU nurses in 14 tertiary grade A hospitals

JIANG Qixia, ZHU Wenjun, NI Juan, LI Li, WANG Yaling, SONG Caiping, WANG Jing, ZHENG Xican, LUO Liqin, TANG Yongli, JI Huiming, JIANG Wei, LI Li   

  1. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, General Hospital Eastern Theater Command of PLA, Nanjing, 210002, China
  • Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-01-15

摘要: 目的:调查三级甲等医院ICU护士掌握压力性损伤预防和护理知识的现况,分析其影响因素,为在职培训提供依据。方法:2023年4月30日至7月30日,采用目的抽样法纳入14家三级甲等医院中符合条件的ICU护士,使用中文版ICU护士压力性损伤相关知识测试问卷对其进行测试,采用Logistic回归分析问卷得分的影响因素。结果:共获得有效问卷1?020份,问卷24个题目的答对率为34.3%~89.7%,得分为4~24(16.10±5.58)分,答对率<60%的题目有9题(37.5%),包括2期压力性损伤的局部处理1题、看图识别压力性损伤分期4题、高危患者减压床垫的选择与使用1题、翻身频率1题和ICU患者发生压力性损伤的流行病学特征2题。问卷的及格率为50.5%(515例),回归分析显示,性别、护士类别和ICU类型是其影响因素。结论:14家三级甲等医院ICU护士压力性损伤知识及格率仅半数,受性别、护士类别和ICU类型影响,主要缺乏压力性损伤分期知识、局部处理、减压垫和翻身频次以及流行病学知识。建议制定在职培训计划时,针对ICU护士主要缺乏的相关知识,并考虑性别、护士类别和ICU类型的影响,以增强培训效果。

关键词: 危重症护理;压力性损伤;问卷调查;在职培训

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the current situation of mastering knowledge of Pressure Injury (PI) prevention and nursing among ICU nurses in tertiary grade A hospitals in China, analyze influencing factors, provide a basis for in-service training. Methods: From April 30th to July 30th, 2023, eligible ICU nurses from 14 tertiary grade A hospitals were selected by using purposive sampling method to independently answer the knowledge test on PI in adult intensive care patients. Using Logistic regression to analyze the influencing factors of questionnaire scores. Results: A total of 1020 valid questionnaires were obtained, with a correct answer rate of 34.3% to 89.7% for 24 questions and a score of 4 to 24 (16.10±5.58) points. There were 9 questions (37.5%) with a correct answer rate of less than 60%, included 1 question on care of stage 2 PI, 4 questions on identifying PI stages based on pictures, 1 question on the selection and use of pressure reducing mattresses for high-risk patients, 1 question on the repositioning frequency and 2 questions on the prevalence characteristics of PI in ICU patients. The pass rate of the questionnaire was 50.5%, Logistic regression showed that gender, nurse category, and ICU of different departments were the influencing factors. Conclusion: The pass rate of PI knowledge among ICU nurses in 14 tertiary grade A hospitals is only half. Due to gender, different nurse categories, and ICU positions, they mainly lack of PI staging, local treatment, pressure reducing mattresses, repositioning frequency, and epidemiological knowledge. It is recommended to increase the relevant knowledge training that ICU nurses lack when developing in-service training plans, and consider the impact of gender, nurse category, and ICU position to improve training effectiveness.

Key words: critical care; Pressure Injury; questionnaire; in-service training

中图分类号:  R47;R197