主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 47-52.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2025.01.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

慢性心力衰竭患者延续护理风险分层筛查指标的构建

曾美玲 刘娟 丁雯 王茹 张紫莹   

  1. 九江学院第二附属医院心内科,332005 江西省九江市(曾美玲);宁夏医科大学总医院心内科(刘娟,王茹);护理部(丁雯);宁夏医科大学护理学院(张紫莹)
  • 出版日期:2025-01-15 发布日期:2025-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 丁雯,硕士,主任护师,护理部副主任,E-mail:1462167721@qq.com
  • 作者简介:曾美玲,硕士
  • 基金资助:
    宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目(2022BEG03093)

Construction of risk stratification screening indexes for transitional care in patients with Chronic Heart Failure

ZENG Meiling, LIU Juan, DING Wen, WANG Ru, ZHANG Ziying   

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jiujiang University Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiujiang, Jiangxi province, 332005, China
  • Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-01-15
  • Contact: E-mail:1462167721@qq.com

摘要: 目的:构建慢性心力衰竭患者延续护理风险分层筛查指标,为该类患者出院后延续护理风险分层评估提供依据。方法:以生物-心理-社会医学模式为理论框架,采用文献分析法、研究小组讨论、德尔菲法构建慢性心力衰竭患者延续护理风险分层筛查指标,结合层次分析法、ABC分类法确定各指标的权重和风险等级,并进行预调查。结果:共完成两轮专家函询,专家积极程度分别为88.89%、100.00%,专家权威系数分别为0.92、0.93,第2轮专家函询一级和二级指标的协调系数分别为0.377、0.130(P<0.05),预调查修改1项指标,最终确定3个一级指标(疾病生理因素、心理社会因素和治疗因素),18个二级指标。结论:构建的慢性心力衰竭患者延续护理风险分层筛查指标具有较好的科学性和可靠性,可有效识别不同风险程度的患者,为实施分层、分级的延续护理提供依据。

关键词: 心力衰竭;风险分层筛查;延续护理;德尔菲法;层次分析法

Abstract: Objective: To establish risk stratification screening indicators for transitional care in patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), and to provide the basis for risk stratification assessment of transitional care for patients with CHF after discharge. Methods: With the biological-psycho-social medical model as the theoretical framework, literature analysis, research group discussion and Delphi method were used to construct the risk stratification screening indicators for transitional care in patients with CHF. The weight and risk rating of each indicator were determined by the analytic hierarchy process and ABC classification, and a pre-survey was carried out. Results: A total of 2 rounds of expert letter consultation were completed, the positive degree of experts was 88.89% and 100.00%, and the expert authority coefficient was 0.92 and 0.93, respectively. The coordination coefficient of indicators at all levels in the second round of expert letter consultation was 0.377 and 0.130, respectively (all P<0.05). A total of 1 indicator was modified in the pre-survey. Finally, 3 primary indicators (physiological factors of disease, psychosocial factors and treatment factors) and 18 secondary indicators were determined. Conclusion: The risk stratification screening index for transitional care of patients with CHF established in this study is scientific and reliable, which can effectively identify patients with different risk in transitional care, to provide the basis for the implementation of hierarchical transitional care.

Key words: heart failure; risk stratification screening; transitional care; Delphi method; analytic hierarchy process

中图分类号:  R47;R197