主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (9): 1312-1317.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.09.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

沟通相关照护负担感量表的汉化及信度效度检验

翁淑静 宁丽 李益民 刘欣 俞梦盈 汤阿毛 陈为霞   

  1. 浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院神经内科,341400 杭州市(翁淑静);护理部(宁丽,李益民,俞梦盈);心内科(刘欣);消化内科(汤阿毛);内分泌科(陈为霞)
  • 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 宁丽,博士,主任护师,护理部主任,E-mail:nl5401@163.com
  • 作者简介:翁淑静,硕士,主管护师
  • 基金资助:
    2022年度浙江省公益技术应用研究项目(LGF22H250005)

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Communication-Burden Scale for family caregivers of post-stroke aphasia patients

WENG Shujing, NING Li, LI Yimin, LIU Xin, YU Mengying, TANG Amao, CHEN Weixia   

  1. Neurology Department, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 341400, China
  • Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-09-15
  • Contact: E-mail:nl5401@163.com

摘要: 目的:汉化沟通相关照护负担感量表并在脑卒中后失语症患者家庭照顾者中检验其信度、效度,形成符合我国文化背景下使用的测评工具。方法:根据FACIT翻译模型对沟通相关照护负担感量表进行汉化及跨文化调适,采用便利抽样法对434例脑卒中后失语症患者的家庭照顾者进行问卷调查,2周后随机抽取32名家庭照顾者进行重测,检验量表的信度、效度。结果:中文版量表包括29个条目,探索性因子分析共提取了6个公因子,累计方差贡献率为57.206%。验证性因子分析显示,卡方自由度比为1.776,渐进残差均方和平方根为0.061,拟合优度指数为0.820,调整后的拟合优度指数为0.783,模型拟合良好。量表总的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.906,重测信度为0.910。结论:中文版沟通相关照护负担感量表具有良好的信度、效度,可以作为评估脑卒中后失语症患者家庭照顾者照护负担的一种有效工具。

关键词: 失语症;照顾者负担;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To develop a Chinese version of the Communication-Burden Scale (COM-B) for family caregivers of aphasia patients after stroke, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: According to FACIT translation model, the COM-B for family caregivers of aphasia patients after stroke was modified for cultural adaptation. Totally 434 family caregivers of aphasia patients were investigated with the convenient sampling method. Two weeks later, 32 caregivers were randomly selected for test-retest reliability of the scale. Results: The Chinese version of the COM-B included 6 dimensions, 29 items. Exploratory factor analysis extracted a total of six common factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 57.206%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the chi square degree of freedom ratio was 1.776, the root mean square error of approximation was 0.061, the goodness of fit index was 0.820, and the adjusted goodness of fit index was 0.783. The model fitted well. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.906. Cronbach's α coefficient of retest reliability was 0.910. Conclusion: The Chinese version of COM-B has good reliability and validity, and it can be used as an effective tool to assess the communication burden of family caregivers of aphasia patients after stroke.

Key words: aphasia; caregiver burden; reliability; validity

中图分类号:  R47;R197