主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (9): 1299-1305.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.09.004

• 特别策划·失智症照护 • 上一篇    下一篇

中度和重度痴呆患者照护技术方案的构建

林永盛 夏梦梦 赵雅洁 李涛 于欣 王志稳 王华丽   

  1. 北京大学第六医院记忆障碍诊疗与研究中心,北京大学精神卫生研究所,国家卫生健康委员会精神卫生学重点实验室(北京大学),国家精神心理疾病临床研究中心,国家精神疾病医学中心,100191 北京市(林永盛,夏梦梦,李涛,于欣,王华丽);上饶市第三人民医院(林永盛);北京大学护理学院(赵雅洁,王志稳);中国医学科学院老年医学研究院(赵雅洁)
  • 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 王华丽,博士,博士生导师,记忆障碍诊疗与研究中心主任,E-mail:huali_wang@bjmu.edu.cn;王志稳,博士,博士生导师,教研室主任,E-mail:wzwjing@sina.com
  • 作者简介:林永盛,本科,主治医师
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科学技术委员会重点研发计划(D171100008217007)

Developing dementia care technology program for patients with moderate to severe dementia

LIN Yongsheng, XIA Mengmeng, ZHAO Yajie, LI Tao, YU Xin, WANG Zhiwen, WANG Huali   

  1. Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Sixth Hospital (Institute of Mental Health), NHC Key Laboratory for Mental Health, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, National Medical Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing, 100191, China
  • Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-09-15
  • Contact: E-mail:huali_wang@bjmu.edu.cn;E-mail:wzwjing@sina.com

摘要: 目的:构建中度和重度痴呆患者照护技术方案,为痴呆患者照护提供实践指引。方法:共35名专家参与了两轮德尔菲法专家咨询,对基于文献调研以及服务实践现状编制的中度和重度痴呆患者照护技术方案初稿的内容框架和照护技术内容进行重要性评价,并提供具体修改和补充建议。结果:两轮专家咨询问卷回收率均为91.43%,权威系数分别为0.906和0.942,协调系数分别为0.096和0.065。最终确定个体化心理社会支持、药物管理、教育、年龄相关躯体疾病管理以及生活环境安排5个一级指标,重要性赋值均数为4.41~4.75,变异系数为0.093~0.181,含89项技术内容,重要性赋值均数为3.84~4.88,变异系数为0.070~0.259。其中,针对中度痴呆患者的照护技术内容37项,针对其照护者39项;在中度痴呆患者照护技术方案的基础上,增加了针对重度痴呆患者的照护技术内容4项,针对其照护者9项。结论:方案涵盖5个照护核心要素,专家意见协调且集中,方案各项条目具有较好的重要性评价等级,可为中度和重度痴呆患者的优质照护实践提供科学指引。

关键词: 痴呆;照护;技术方案;德尔菲法

Abstract: Objective: To develope the care technology program for patients with moderate to severe dementia, and to offer practical guidance for dementia care. Methods: A total of 35 experts were involved in two rounds of expert consultation using the Delphi method. The first draft of the care technology program which was developed based on literature review and service practice, was assessed for importance, and experts provided specific modifications and supplementary suggestions. Results: The response rates for the two rounds of expert consultation were both 91.43%, authoritative coefficients were 0.906 and 0.942, coordination coefficients were 0.096 and 0.065, respectively. Following the two rounds of expert consultation, five care elements, including personalized psychosocial support, drug management, education, age-related physical disease management, and living environment arrangement, were determined as primary indicators. These elements received a mean importance assignment of 4.41-4.75, with a coefficient of variation of 0.093-0.181. Additionally, there were 89 subordinating technical content with a mean importance assignment of 3.84-4.88 and a coefficient of variation of 0.070-0.259. Specifically, there were 37 care technologies for patients with moderate dementia and 39 care technologies for their caregivers. For severe dementia patients, there were 4 additive items, and 9 additive items for their caregivers. Conclusion: The care technology program covers five core care elements, can provide scientific guidance for high-quality care practice for patients with moderate to severe dementia. The expert opinions are coordinated and centralized, and each item of the program has been evaluated to have a good level of importance.

Key words: dementia; care; technology program; Delphi method

中图分类号:  R47;R197