主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 834-838.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.06.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

共享决策干预对前路颈椎间盘切除融合术患者预后的影响

钱瑜 刘欢 赵中晶 赵磊 杜巨豹 陈赞   

  1. 首都医科大学宣武医院神经外科,100053 北京市(钱瑜,刘欢,赵中晶,陈赞); 麻醉手术科(赵磊);康复医学科(杜巨豹)
  • 出版日期:2023-06-15 发布日期:2023-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈赞,博士,主任医师,E-mail:13911712120@163.com
  • 作者简介:钱瑜,本科,主管护师,护士长
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学宣武医院护理专项课题(XWHL-2018002)

Influence of shared decision-making interventions on the prognosis of patients undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

QIAN Yu, LIU Huan, ZHAO Zhongjing, ZHAO Lei, DU Jubao, CHEN Zan   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
  • Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-15
  • Contact: E-mail:13911712120@163.com

摘要: 目的:分析共享决策干预对前路颈椎间盘切除融合术患者预后的影响,为临床提供参考。方法:采用便利取样法,纳入2018年8月至2019年7月在首都医科大学宣武医院神经外科行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的128例患者作为研究对象,对照组(n=64)接受常规护理干预,干预组(n=64)在常规护理干预的基础上接受共享决策干预。分别于入院时、出院前1日、出院后3个月、出院后6个月、出院后12个月比较两组颈椎功能障碍指数、颈椎轴性症状评分、日本骨科学会颈椎评分及术后改善率的差异、患者满意度。结果:实施共享决策干预后,干预组与对照组在颈椎功能障碍指数、颈椎轴性症状评分及日本骨科学会颈椎评分项目之间的差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组颈椎评分改善率之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预组患者的满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:实施共享决策干预有利于改善患者颈椎功能障碍的程度,减轻患者轴性症状,改善患者远期预后,从而提升患者满意度。

关键词: 共享决策干预;颈椎病;前路颈椎减压融合术;预后;预康复

Abstract: Objective: To explore the influence of shared decision-making interventions on patients receiving Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF). Methods: Convenient sampling method was used to enroll 128 patients given ACDF in our hospital from August 2018 to July 2019 as the research objects, 64 patients as the experimental group, and 64 patients as the control group. The experimental group was offered shared decision-making interventions on the basis of routine nursing, while the control group received routine nursing. Neck Disability Index (NDI), cervical Axial Syndrom (AS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and postoperative improvement rate, hospitalization satisfaction were compared between the two groups at admission, the day before discharge, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation. Results: After the implementation of shared decision-making interventions, significant differences were observed in NDI score, AS score, JOA score and hospitalization satisfaction (P<0.05), while the difference in JOA improvement rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: The implementation of shared decision-making interventions can reduce the degree of cervical dysfunction, relieve the axial symptoms of patients, improve the cervical spine function in the long term to optimize their prognosis, thereby meeting the expectation of medical staff and increasing patients' satisfaction.

Key words: shared decision-making intervention; cervical spondylopathy; Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion; prognosis; prehabilitation

中图分类号:  R473.6;R197